The Sixties Radical The Lies Told by Elite Republicans and their Buds in the Media

The drum beat from the media and the Republican leadership is a bunch of bullshit.

They are scream from Capital Hill “This is the best deal we can get so deal with it.”

This is pure bull crap.

I am sick and tired of this shit.

Imagine if Dwight Eisenhower said this bull crap when the Germans had his troops pinned on Normandy.

This is best deal we can get so lets pull back.

Instead the American troops gutted it out and drove the Nazis all the back to Germany.

Imagine President Lincoln said this after his Union troops were defeated battle after battle.

Okay guys this is the best deal we can get so let the South have the south and we’ll take the North.

Bullshit.

Lincoln kept looking for a general who would lead the Union troops to victory.

Ulysses S. Grant.

Bingo.

Victory for the nation.

Imagine the leaders of the Continental Congress giving up and saying this is the best deal we can get after George Washington suffered ass kicking after ass kicking in the early part of the war. The war changed a few years later when Washington won the day  with a huge victory over the British and their Hessian troops at Trenton.

What chicken shit John Boehner and the rest of the Republican leadership are doing is playing the blame game.

Here is the horrible bill so now the balls in your court.

The Democrat Socialist Party has said this baby is DOA. 

Fight for our rights.

This is not a freakin game.

Our countries very life is on the line.

We have to stand up and fight.

NO MORE SPENDING.

WE ARE BROKE.

Over the past few days Republican Leadership has been calling shows like Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Laura Ingraham and Sean Hannity to get these people on board with their bullshit plan.

The talking heads in the media are trashing people like me.

They think we are a bunch creatures who should go back under the rocks from where we came.

A little history fools. If it wasn’t for folks like me John Boehner would never have become the speaker of the House.

The Republican Party was dead after the 2008 election.

Instead of running on conservative principles the idiots in charge John McCain decided to take the no road to a loss.

Conservative principles are these life, liberty, economic freedom, the pursuit of happiness, belief in the God of the Bible, Judaism, Christianity, or the religion of your choice, family, education, morals and values, right and wrong, judgments, the rule of law, The Ten Commandments, and the Constitution.

Before you have a cow with the word judgments let me explain. We better have judgments if not you are screwed as a person.

You better be able to judge what is right or wrong.

 The Constitution is a good start so read this baby sometime.

Then try John Locke.

The best deal you can get- how about Neville Chamberlain taking the deal with Adolph Hitler.

This was a deal with evil.

Chamberlain held up the paper and said we have peace.

Hitler broke the deal and that bastard murdered seven million of my ancestors.

The sad fact is this. We don’t have years to get our house in order.

It could be as little as months before this house of cards will come crumbling down.

John Boehner and his ilk are like the alcoholic who keeps on drinking.

They don’t see how they are destroying their lives, the lives of their family, and everyone they come in contact with. 

Sure they feel bad but when King Alcohol comes a calling they pick the sucker up.

They are blind to the destruction they are causing.

Each time they drink and they expect different results.

Instead it is the total destruction of the person, their family and everyone else who gets in their way.

The booze in this case is other people’s money and the power to control our lives.

John Boehner, Eric Cantor, John McCain etal are in denial. No this not the river in Egypt

Look folks the Democrat Socialist Party, the evil Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck “YOU” Schumer, the Left, the lap dog media, and the Libs are out to destroy us.

They hate us Conservatives.

We stand in their way from taking over this country.

This is a real war.

If the evil Obama wins our country will be destroyed. This nation will turned into a pure Marxist state.

You can kiss all your freedom bye-bye.

The evil King Obama will run this country with an iron fist.

The Left will control our every action from shitting to what much food we can buy to what kind of car we can drive to what kind of food we can eat while at the same time they say and do what they want.

Obama and the Democrat Party are pure evil.

They have to be destroyed.

When good compromises with evil, evil wins.

Neville Chamberlain is a prime example of this.

Here is some food for thought-

Benjamin Franklin  – In the beginning of the Contest with Great Britain, when we were sensible of danger we had daily prayer in this room for the Divine protection – Our prayers, Sir, were heard, and they were graciously answered. All of us who were engaged in the struggle must have observed frequent instances of a superintending providence in our favor. To that kind providence we owe this happy opportunity of consulting in peace on the means of establishing our future national felicity. And have we now forgotten that powerful Friend? or do we imagine we no longer need His Assistance? AND: I pronounce it as certain that there was never yet a truly great man that was not at the same time truly virtuous.”  (The Busy-body, No. 3, 18 February 1728)  Reference: The Works of Benjamin Franklin, Bigelow, ed., vol. 1 (350)

James Madison, Primary Author of the U.S. Constitution: Article I of the Constitution begins: “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States.” Section 8 of Article I then goes on to enumerate those powers, of which James Madison wrote: If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the Government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one, subject to particular exceptions.”

“We have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind of self-government; upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God.”

“The preservation of a free government requires not merely that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be invariably maintained; but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the great Barrier which defends the rights of the people. The Rulers who are guilty of such an encroachment, exceed the commission from which they derive their authority and are Tyrants. The people who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an authority derived from them, and are slaves.”

“It is impossible for the man of pious reflection not to perceive in it [The Constitution] a finger of that almighty hand which has been so frequently and signally extended to our relief in the critical stages of the revolution.”

“Charity is no part of the legislative duty of the government.”

With respect to the two words general welfare, I have always regarded them as qualified by the detail of powers connected with them. To take them in a literal and unlimited sense would be a metamorphosis of the Constitution into a character which there is a host of proofs was not contemplated by its creators. It broaches a new Constitutional doctrine of vast consequence, and demanding the serious attention of the public. I consider it myself as subverting the fundamental and characteristic principle of the government; as contrary to the true and fair, as well as the received construction, and as bidding defiance to the sense in which the Constitution is known to have been proposed, advocated and adopted. If Congress can do whatever in their discretion can be done by money, and will promote the General Welfare, the government is no longer a limited one, possessing enumerated powers, but an indefinite one, subject to particular exceptions.”

“The future and success of America is not in this Constitution, but in the laws of God upon which this Constitution is founded.”

“If individuals be not influenced by moral principles; it is in vain to look for public virtue; it is, therefore, the duty of legislators to enforce, both by precept and example, the utility, as well as the necessity of a strict adherence to the rules of distributive justice.” –James Madison, in response to Washington’s first Inaugural address, 1789

“Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.”

“I cannot undertake to lay my finger on that article of the Constitution which granted a right to Congress of expending, on objects of benevolence, the money of their constituents.”

The Sixties Radical The Statists and The Media are Lairs

Once again the ruling class doesn’t have a clue on what how the real world operates.

John Boehner is another in long line of jackass politicians who are raping the American people with the stupid fiscal ideas.

In the real world a cut in spending means exactly what one does.

It is cut out of the budget.

Not in the political word.

In the world of Washington DC this means you spend like hell until the truth catches up with ya.

Obama will spend 9.7 trillion dollars.

Then the idiot ruling class will tell ya that okay now we’ll cut 1.7 trillion dollars over the next ten years.

And this is called spending cuts.

Do the math.

Some how this is called a saving.

In the real world these clowns haven’t done crap to fix the problem.

Instead of cutting spending the elite ruling class are giving Obama a blank check for 9.7 trillion dollars.

This is call insanity.

Insanity means doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results.

If a CEO submitted a budget like this he would be put in jail.

WE ARE BROKE.

WE DON’T HAVE THE MONEY.

THIS INSANITY HAS TO STOP.

Speaker of the House John Boehner, Harry Reid, the evil Obama and the rest think, “We the American People are stupid.”

We are tired of this shit.

Cut spending means cut spending.

Not fake cuts or Washingtonian gimmicks to make it look like there are cuts being made when in reality the spending and taxes will go through the roof.

November 2012 John Beohner and his ilk will get the full wrath of the American people.

These are Boehner’s exact words on the Rush Limbaugh show.

Well, this agreement was worked out between myself and the bipartisan leadership in the Senate, and it’s a two-step process. It cuts $1.2 trillion from the discretionary portion of the budget over the next ten years and puts spending caps in place that will make sure that that savings actually does, in fact, occur.
It mounts up over time, but in the first year, you know, we’re already spending $38-1/2 less than what we spent last year in that portion of the budget. This will cut another $26 billion out of real outlays going out and about $7 billion in what we call budget authority. Secondly, though, it sets up a joint select committee of the members of Congress: Six members from the House — three Democrats, three Republicans — and six members of the Senate. And they’re charged with finding an additional $1.8 trillion worth of deficit reduction over the balance of this year. And they all meet. Any proposal that gets seven votes out of that group would go into a package where there’s an automatic up-or-down vote in the House and Senate

There really are Democrats who want to cut spending, and I’m confident that our members can go in there and make the case for why America needs to act because the greatest risk to our country is not missing August the 2nd. The greatest risk is that we do not make the cuts necessary to put our financial house in order.
Well, listen, now we’re getting into budget talk. It’s $7 billion in budget authority below the current year. It’s $26 billion below in actual outlays that go out the door — and again, remember, we made big cuts from last year into this year. We’re gonna make more cuts going into next year. When have you ever seen a Congress in that one-third of the budget actually spend less from one year to the next? And we’re gonna do it two years in row, and frankly we might even get to three years in a row.
First, if this bill were to pass, the President could ask for an increase in the debt limit up to 95% of the cuts. Remember one of the principles here: We are not gonna increase the debt limit by anything more than what we’re willing to cut spending. I’ve said the cuts have to exceed it, he’d have to ask for it.
Trillion dollars roughly and will take them probably into February, maybe March

We waited too long to deal with the problem — and when we got 10,000 Baby Boomers like us retiring every day, more money for Social Security, more money for Medicare, it’s just a fact. But I believe that the joint select committee can in fact produce real cuts in spending. But there’s a third part of this, Rush, and that is that it requires the House and Senate to have a vote on a balanced budget amendment after October 1st and before the joint committee would report — and the idea here is twofold. One is to get all of our friends on the same page as to which balanced budget amendment, and secondly, to allow the American people our members and others to put pressure on these liberal members of Congress to step up and to vote for a balanced budget amendment — and, frankly, we need time to build that support because today, I’m not sure it’s there.
That’s the point the President’s making. That’s why he wants a $2.4 trillion blank check today that lets him continue his spending spree. If, in fact, the joint committee does not report the Congress is going to have to act, and we could be right where we are today. But it’s the only way to force the Congress to make the cuts necessary to get our fiscal house in order. Now, I’ll be the first one to tell you, this plan isn’t perfect. Again, it was an agreement between both houses of the Congress.
Well, some people are concerned that the joint committee, “My God, they might raise taxes.” Well, I’m gonna tell you what: It’s gonna be pretty hard for the joint committee to do that. I don’t believe that the Republicans on this committee that get appointed are gonna vote to increase taxes — and if they did, I don’t believe the House of Representatives would approve the report of the joint committee. So I don’t fear that problem — and, frankly, I’m not afraid of the debate. If they want to have that debate, let’s have it.
Let’s separate the two issues, Rush. The debt ceiling is about debts that America has already incurred, obligations that we’ve already made. It’s like you going out and buying something on your credit card. You’re obligated to pay for it, and these debts have already been incurred — and, frankly, I think it’s the moral obligation of our government to meet its debts. Having said that, it is time. If you’re charging more than what you can afford, it’s time to start spending less. What I’m trying to do is set up a scenario with this bill that we’re trying to move through the House to force the Congress to finally act.
Then Congress will have to go through the regular process, which isn’t that hard in the House. It’s much harder in the Senate, and frankly this joint select committee was set up to facilitate a real vote to cut spending in the United States Senate.

This plan is stupid. This plan will send us even faster on fast track to hell.

This is what you get when let John Boehner and his merry band of idiots run the show the destruction of our country.

The add to the mix an evil Marxist Obama, the Democrat Socialist Party, the Left and all the Libs this is a sure concoction that will blow this country smithereens.

WE NEED REAL CONSERVATIVES AND CONSTITUTIONLISTS TO FIX THIS COUNTRY.

Here is a novel idea don’t spend more than you take in.

Ten percent should be saved, ten percent to help the poor, and the rest take care of the bills.

Try it works,.

This is called ECON 101.

The Sixties Radical on The Planned Destruction of The USA by Obama and The Democrat Party

This is not business as usual in Washington DC. This is not the time for timid souls. Our country is on the brink of getting pushed over the cliff into utter destruction by the evil Obama, his mates in the Democrat Socialist Party, the Left, all the Libs in this country, the statists in the Republican Party, and the suck ass state run media.

We don’t have the time to mess around on the edges or in the weeds.
If we don’t stop this runaway freight train headed for over the cliff our nation will be destroyed.

We are broke.

We don’t have the money.

We the People sent a message to the Democrat Socialist Party; the statists in the Republican Party and the evil Prez Obama stop the spending now.

Cut this crap out now.

Yet, the way these clowns are acting in way one would think the election of November 2010 never happened.

These evil people have spread lie after lie.

I call them evil because they know exactly what they are doing.

Obama and his merry evil force are destroying this country on purpose.

This is a hard fact to swallow.

Let’s look at the facts.

Here is a look at the evil Obama’s fiscal record.

This taken from Mark Levin’s website.

Despite newfound concern with the debt overhang stifling economic growth, President Obama’s record falls far short of his rhetoric.  Let’s review the decisions made by President Obama and Congressional Democrats over the past couple of years, and the disappointing results of their policy choices:

January 20, 2009 
President Obama sworn into office

  • President tells the American people in his Inaugural Address: “Those of us who manage the public’s dollars will be held to account, to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day, because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government.”
  • Debt Held By Public = $6.31 trillion

February 17, 2009
President Signs into Law the Spending Stimulus

  • The stimulus adds $821 billion in new spending according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
  • The White House promises this infusion of spending and borrowing would keep unemployment rate below 8%.  As millions of Americans are painfully aware, that promise was broken.
  • Debt Held by Public = $6.48 trillion

February 26, 2009
President Issues FY2010 Budget

  • The President’s budget adds $2.7 trillion in new debt in FY2010 and imposes $1.4 trillion in new taxes.
  • Debt Held by Public = $6.58 trillion

March 11, 2009
President Signs FY2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act

  • The massive spending bill includes 8,696 earmarks at a cost of $11 billion.
  • The spending bill adds $19 billion in new spending above the baseline – an 8.6% spending increase.
  • Debt Held by Public = $6.66 trillion

April 29, 2009
Congressional Democrats Pass FY2010 Budget

  • The Congressional Democrats’ budget calls for a $2 trillion debt increase in 2010, and another 8.9% increase in non-defense discretionary spending.
  • The reconciliation process is abused to later pave the way for health care overhaul to be jammed into law.
  • Of note: this is the last time Congressional Democrats will bother budgeting.
  • Of note: this is the last time Congressional Democrats will bother budgeting.
  • Debt Held by Public = $6.85 trillion

February 2, 2010
President Issues FY2011 Budget

  • The President’s budget more than doubles the debt; pushes the FY2011 deficit to a new record of $1.6 trillion; drives spending to a new record of $3.8 trillion in fiscal year 2011; and raises taxes by more than $2 trillion through 2020, under the administration’s own estimates.
  • Debt Held by Public = $7.85 trillion

March 23, 2010
President Signs Health-Care Overhaul Into Law

  • The massive new law adds $1.4 trillion in new spending over the next decade, and over $2.5 trillion once the law is fully implemented.
  • Despite sluggish economic growth and high unemployment, the law imposes over $500 billion in new tax hikes.  CBO Director Elmendorf would later testify that the law would reduce employment by roughly half a percent – a reduction of approximately 800,000 jobs.
  • Debt Held by Public = $8.18 trillion

April 15, 2010 
Congressional Democrats Decide Not to Do a Budget for FY2011 

  • The 1974 Budget Act requires Congress to pass a budget each year by April 15.
  • In an unprecedented budget failure, House Democrats not only failed to pass a budget – they opted to not even propose a budget.
  • Debt Held by Public = $8.39 trillion

July 21, 2010
President Signs Financial Regulatory Overhaul Into Law

  • In addition to heightened regulatory uncertainty, the massive new law adds $10.2 billion in new spending
  • Debt Held by Public = $8.69 trillion

February 14, 2011
President Issues FY2012 Budget

  • The President’s budget yet again calls for the doubling of the debt in five years, and tripling the debt in ten years.
  • The President’s budget spends $47 trillion over the next decade, imposes over $1 trillion in new tax hikes, and fails to address the drivers of the debt.
  • Debt Held by Public = $9.45 trillion

April 13, 2011
President Delivers Speech on Deficit Reduction

  • The President appears to abandon his own budget by offering a ‘framework’ that calls for additional tax increases, defense spending cuts, and Medicare price controls – yet lacks sufficient detail to back-up claims of deficit reduction.
  • Debt Held by Public = $9.65 trillion

July 15, 2011
President Holds Press Conference: “We’re Running Out of Time” to Deal with Debt

  • President Obama tells reporters: “I’ve got reams of paper and printouts and spreadsheets on my desk, and so we know how we can create a package that solves the deficits and debt for a significant period of time.  But in order to do that, we got to get started now.”
  • The American people have still not seen any “paper” or “printouts” of what specific spending cuts the President supports.  The American people have still not seen any “spreadsheets” from the White House to corroborate their claims of having offered a deficit reduction plan.
  • While it’s long past time for Washington “to get started now” on tackling our debt problems, President Obama has still not proposed a credible budget, and Senate Democrats have still not proposed any budget.
  • Debt Held by Public = $9.75 trillion

Any simpleton knows that you can’t spend more money than you take in. If you do you are in the shits.

Yet, Washington DC’s math and economic policies defy logic. These statists want us to believe than we can keep taxing and spending ourselves silly and nothing bad will come from it.

In Washington Dc it is all about smoke and mirrors.

If these people tried these practices in the real world they would all be thrown in jail.

This is called cooking the books.

In plain and simple English making numbers up to hide the real facts of the dire situation we are really in.

If this were true Russia would still be around under the dictatorship of the Communist Party.

These failed economic policies have destroyed Greece, Spain, and Portugal.

The next country to go down the drink will us.

If this happens the rest of the free world is fucked.

This is why we must not let the government increase the debt limited.

If this happens it will be months not years when this country will be thrown into economic chaos.

If this happens what happened in Europe will look like child’s play.

Our founding fathers warned us about these very circumstances.

Thomas Jefferson pushed for a balanced budget amendment in 1798.

Here are some quotes from our founding fathers-

“Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is a necessary evil: in its worst state, an intolerable one.” –Thomas Paine

“Some writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. Society is produced by our wants and government by our wickedness; the former promotes our happiness positively by uniting our affections, the latter negatively by restraining our vices. The one encourages intercourse, the other creates distinctions. The first is a patron, the last a punisher.” –Thomas Paine, Common Sense, 1776.

“It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.” –Thomas Jefferson

“I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.” –Thomas Jefferson

“My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.” –Thomas Jefferson

“To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.” –Thomas Jefferson

And in light of our Washington leaders stated goal of re-inflating the housing bubble: “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.” –Thomas Jefferson

The Sixties Radical on John Boehner Selling Out his Country to The Evil Obama

Once again the conservatives have been given the kachingas. Our own party has sold us down the river. John Boehner is a chicken shit that will do anything to stay in power.

John Boehner had the balls to lie on the Rush Limbaugh show saying that a deal has not been struck.

It may not be in writing but it is 90% done.

You sold this country out.

You have given the evil Prez a lifeline.

Yet this lifeline will kill and destroy this country.

John Boehner is the Speaker of the House because we the people voted the idiots out of office.

We didn’t elect asshole Beohner to Speaker of The House.

Your crony chicken shit Republicans did.

We are not your subjects of King Obama.

This is not a dictatorship.

This is a Constitutional Republic but we would never know it.

Look Boehner you jack ass when you threw King Obama a lifeline in essence you just destroyed our way of life.

This lie is this. The evil one, the lying sack of shit media, The Democrat Socialist Party, The sellout Republicans, John McCain, Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Lindsey Graham, Susan Collins etal are spewing that the country will default if we don’t increase the debt ceiling.

The opposite is true.

We will not default.

We have enough money coming in each month to take care of all of our obligations.

Obama will be the one who is responsible for not paying social security recipients, Military personnel etal not the Republicans.

Yet these good for nothing-chicken shits believe this lie.

When Boehner spread his lies he used the words default on our loans if we don’t increase the debt limit.

Actually these are the evil Obama’s words.

The truth is we are broke.

I am tired of all of this crap.  

John Boehner you are responsible for driving the country over the cliff.

You have given the keys to King Obama to do this.

We don’t have the money.

You can’t spend what you don’t have.

This is basic ECON 101.

Yet all common sense is thrown out the window in the name of progress.

John Boehner you have driven another nail into our countries coffin.

One further question how does one compromise with evil?

When good compromises with evil, evil wins.

We have to take our country back.

 

 

 

 

The Sixties Radical on Statist Republicans who are Selling on Their Country to Keep Power

I can’t believe this shit. The gang of six is at it again. This time these idiots are about to send this country right to hell with their idiocy.

That’s right cut a deal a with the evil Obama. These clowns believe all the bullshit that is spewed out by the lying sacks of shit in the press, Standard and Poor, Moody’s and the rest.

These people will sell their soul for a buck.

This is a bold face lie.

When the country reaches the debt ceiling we as a country have to payoff the obligations of the bond owners and all of that.

We have enough money to do that each month.

This is the bold face lie the media, The Prez, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, John Coburn, Susan Collins, and the rest of the statists want you to believe.

Here is a definition of statist or statism- Statism (or etatism) is a scholarly term in political philosophy either emphasising the role of the state in analysing political change; or, in describing political movements which support the use of the state to achieve goals.

When used to describe analyses, statism refers to analyses that use a dichotomy between state and society, with the state viewed as a homogeneous institution capable of using political power to enact policy on a passive or resisting society composed of the body of people. Such an analysis, dependent on the elitist theory of power, is contested by those who prefer the pluralist theory of power which contends that power is exercised by individuals and competing organisations within society.[1][2]

Economic statism (dirigisme), for instance, promotes the view that the state has a major and legitimate role in directing the economy, either directly through state-owned enterprises and other types of machinery of government, or indirectly through economic planning.[3][4] It may refer to the ideology of statism that holds that:

Sovereignty is vested not in the people but in the national state, and that all individuals and associations exist only to enhance the power, the prestige, and the well-being of the state. The concept of statism, which is seen as synonymous with the concept of nation, and corporatism repudiates individualism and exalts the nation as an organic body headed by the Supreme Leader and nurtured by unity, force, and discipline.[5]

The term statism is sometimes used to refer to state capitalism or highly-regulated market economies with large amounts of government intervention. It is also used to refer to state socialism or co-operative economic systems that use the state, through nationalization, as a means of running industry.

 

This is what these evil people are doing to this free country of ours. They want to set themselves up as the ruling class.

Now the gang of six lead by John McCain wanta be- Republican Senator from Oklahoma John Coburn, Joe Lieberman Senator Connecticut, Susan Collins, Maine just to name a few are doing.

These idiots have to go.

Colburn etal you are selling out this country.

If this country continues down this path we are doomed.

W E DON’T HAVE THE MONEY.

WE ARE BROKE.

Obama is a Marxists.

You want to give him what! To do what! Are you freakin nuts?

Shut it the %%$$## down.

Let’s restore some sanity to our Marxist spending ways.

We the People have too much on our backs.

What do you want every penny we make to so you can give it away to the Democrat Socialist Party, and the Republican Party to spend on their special interests.

Oh, Yeah, that’s the plan.

This is called stealing.

Here is some food for thought.

What is happening in the good old USA is not a new idea. These ideas have been around since the dawn of man.

Jean Jacques Rousseau wrote these words in 1762.

I WARN the reader that this chapter requires careful reading, and that I am unable to make myself clear to those who refuse to be attentive. Every free action is produced by the concurrence of two causes; one moral, i.e., the will which determines the act; the other physical, i.e., the power which executes it. When I walk towards an object, it is necessary first that I should will to go there, and, in the second place, that my feet should carry me. If a paralytic wills to run and an active man wills not to, they will both stay where they are. The body politic has the same motive powers; here too force and will are distinguished, will under the name of legislative power and force under that of executive power. Without their concurrence, nothing is, or should be, done.

We have seen that the legislative power belongs to the people, and can belong to it alone. It may, on the other hand, readily be seen, from the principles laid down above, that the executive power cannot belong to the generality as legislature or Sovereign, because it consists wholly of particular acts which fall outside the competency of the law, and consequently of the Sovereign, whose acts must always be laws.

The public force therefore needs an agent of its own to bind it together and set it to work under the direction of the general will, to serve as a means of communication between the State and the Sovereign, and to do for the collective person more or less what the union of soul and body does for man. Here we have what is, in the State, the basis of government, often wrongly confused with the Sovereign, whose minister it is.

What then is government? An intermediate body set up between the subjects and the Sovereign, to secure their mutual correspondence, charged with the execution of the laws and the maintenance of liberty, both civil and political.

The members of this body are called magistrates or kings, that is to say governors, and the whole body bears the name prince.18 Thus those who hold that the act, by which a people puts itself under a prince, is not a contract, are certainly right. It is simply and solely a commission, an employment, in which the rulers, mere officials of the Sovereign, exercise in their own name the power of which it makes them depositaries. This power it can limit, modify or recover at pleasure; for the alienation of such a right is incompatible with the nature of the social body, and contrary to the end of association.

I call then government, or supreme administration, the legitimate exercise of the executive power, and prince or magistrate the man or the body entrusted with that administration.

In government reside the intermediate forces whose relations make up that of the whole to the whole, or of the Sovereign to the State. This last relation may be represented as that between the extreme terms of a continuous proportion, which has government as its mean proportional. The government gets from the Sovereign the orders it gives the people, and, for the State to be properly balanced, there must, when everything is reckoned in, be equality between the product or power of the government taken in itself, and the product or power of the citizens, who are on the one hand sovereign and on the other subject.

Furthermore, none of these three terms can be altered without the equality being instantly destroyed. If the Sovereign desires to govern, or the magistrate to give laws, or if the subjects refuse to obey, disorder takes the place of regularity, force and will no longer act together, and the State is dissolved and falls into despotism or anarchy. Lastly, as there is only one mean proportional between each relation, there is also only one good government possible for a State. But, as countless events may change the relations of a people, not only may different governments be good for different peoples, but also for the same people at different times.

In attempting to give some idea of the various relations that may hold between these two extreme terms, I shall take as an example the number of a people, which is the most easily expressible.

Suppose the State is composed of ten thousand citizens. The Sovereign can only be considered collectively and as a body; but each member, as being a subject, is regarded as an individual: thus the Sovereign is to the subject as ten thousand to one, i.e., each member of the State has as his share only a ten-thousandth part of the sovereign authority, although he is wholly under its control. If the people numbers a hundred thousand, the condition of the subject undergoes no change, and each equally is under the whole authority of the laws, while his vote, being reduced to a hundred-thousandth part, has ten times less influence in drawing them up. The subject therefore remaining always a unit, the relation between him and the Sovereign increases with the number of the citizens. From this it follows that, the larger the State, the less the liberty.

When I say the relation increases, I mean that it grows more unequal. Thus the greater it is in the geometrical sense, the less relation there is in the ordinary sense of the word. In the former sense, the relation, considered according to quantity, is expressed by the quotient; in the latter, considered according to identity, it is reckoned by similarity.

Now, the less relation the particular wills have to the general will, that is, morals and manners to laws, the more should the repressive force be increased. The government, then, to be good, should be proportionately stronger as the people is more numerous.

On the other hand, as the growth of the State gives the depositaries of the public authority more temptations and chances of abusing their power, the greater the force with which the government ought to be endowed for keeping the people in hand, the greater too should be the force at the disposal of the Sovereign for keeping the government in hand. I am speaking, not of absolute force, but of the relative force of the different parts of the State.

It follows from this double relation that the continuous proportion between the Sovereign, the prince and the people, is by no means an arbitrary idea, but a necessary consequence of the nature of the body politic. It follows further that, one of the extreme terms, viz., the people, as subject, being fixed and represented by unity, whenever the duplicate ratio increases or diminishes, the simple ratio does the same, and is changed accordingly. From this we see that there is not a single unique and absolute form of government, but as many governments differing in nature as there are States differing in size.

If, ridiculing this system, any one were to say that, in order to find the mean proportional and give form to the body of the government, it is only necessary, according to me, to find the square root of the number of the people, I should answer that I am here taking this number only as an instance; that the relations of which I am speaking are not measured by the number of men alone, but generally by the amount of action, which is a combination of a multitude of causes; and that, further, if, to save words, I borrow for a moment the terms of geometry, I am none the less well aware that moral quantities do not allow of geometrical accuracy.

The government is on a small scale what the body politic which includes it is on a great one. It is a moral person endowed with certain faculties, active like the Sovereign and passive like the State, and capable of being resolved into other similar relations. This accordingly gives rise to a new proportion, within which there is yet another, according to the arrangement of the magistracies, till an indivisible middle term is reached, i.e., a single ruler or supreme magistrate, who may be represented, in the midst of this progression, as the unity between the fractional and the ordinal series.

Without encumbering ourselves with this multiplication of terms, let us rest content with regarding government as a new body within the State, distinct from the people and the Sovereign, and intermediate between them.

There is between these two bodies this essential difference, that the State exists by itself, and the government only through the Sovereign. Thus the dominant will of the prince is, or should be, nothing but the general will or the law; his force is only the public force concentrated in his hands, and, as soon as he tries to base any absolute and independent act on his own authority, the tie that binds the whole together begins to be loosened. If finally the prince should come to have a particular will more active than the will of the Sovereign, and should employ the public force in his hands in obedience to this particular will, there would be, so to speak, two Sovereigns, one rightful and the other actual, the social union would evaporate instantly, and the body politic would be dissolved.

However, in order that the government may have a true existence and a real life distinguishing it from the body of the State, and in order that all its members may be able to act in concert and fulfil the end for which it was set up, it must have a particular personality, a sensibility common to its members, and a force and will of its own making for its preservation. This particular existence implies assemblies, councils, power and deliberation and decision, rights, titles, and privileges belonging exclusively to the prince and making the office of magistrate more honourable in proportion as it is more troublesome. The difficulties lie in the manner of so ordering this subordinate whole within the whole, that it in no way alters the general constitution by affirmation of its own, and always distinguishes the particular force it possesses, which is destined to aid in its preservation, from the public force, which is destined to the preservation of the State; and, in a word, is always ready to sacrifice the government to the people, and never to sacrifice the people to the government.

Furthermore, although the artificial body of the government is the work of another artificial body, and has, we may say, only a borrowed and subordinate life, this does not prevent it from being able to act with more or less vigour or promptitude, or from being, so to speak, in more or less robust health. Finally, without departing directly from the end for which it was instituted, it may deviate more or less from it, according to the manner of its constitution.

From all these differences arise the various relations which the government ought to bear to the body of the State, according to the accidental and particular relations by which the State itself is modified, for often the government that is best in itself will become the most pernicious, if the relations in which it stands have altered according to the defects of the body politic to which it belongs.

Thank God our founding fathers rejected this drivel.

 

Rousseau went on to write-

 

4. DEMOCRACY

HE who makes the law knows better than any one else how it should be executed and interpreted. It seems then impossible to have a better constitution than that in which the executive and legislative powers are united; but this very fact renders the government in certain respects inadequate, because things which should be distinguished are confounded, and the prince and the Sovereign, being the same person, form, so to speak, no more than a government without government.

It is not good for him who makes the laws to execute them, or for the body of the people to turn its attention away from a general standpoint and devote it to particular objects. Nothing is more dangerous than the influence of private interests in public affairs, and the abuse of the laws by the government is a less evil than the corruption of the legislator, which is the inevitable sequel to a particular standpoint. In such a case, the State being altered in substance, all reformation becomes impossible, A people that would never misuse governmental powers would never misuse independence; a people that would always govern well would not need to be governed.

If we take the term in the strict sense, there never has been a real democracy, and there never will be. It is against the natural order for the many to govern and the few to be governed. It is unimaginable that the people should remain continually assembled to devote their time to public affairs, and it is clear that they cannot set up commissions for that purpose without the form of administration being changed.

In fact, I can confidently lay down as a principle that, when the functions of government are shared by several tribunals, the less numerous sooner or later acquire the greatest authority, if only because they are in a position to expedite affairs, and power thus naturally comes into their hands.

Besides, how many conditions that are difficult to unite does such a government presuppose! First, a very small State, where the people can readily be got together and where each citizen can with ease know all the rest; secondly, great simplicity of manners, to prevent business from multiplying and raising thorny problems; next, a large measure of equality in rank and fortune, without which equality of rights and authority cannot long subsist; lastly, little or no luxury — for luxury either comes of riches or makes them necessary; it corrupts at once rich and poor, the rich by possession and the poor by covetousness; it sells the country to softness and vanity, and takes away from the State all its citizens, to make them slaves one to another, and one and all to public opinion.

This is why a famous writer has made virtue the fundamental principle of Republics;E1 for all these conditions could not exist without virtue. But, for want of the necessary distinctions, that great thinker was often inexact, and sometimes obscure, and did not see that, the sovereign authority being everywhere the same, the same principle should be found in every well-constituted State, in a greater or less degree, it is true, according to the form of the government.

It may be added that there is no government so subject to civil wars and intestine agitations as democratic or popular government, because there is none which has so strong and continual a tendency to change to another form, or which demands more vigilance and courage for its maintenance as it is. Under such a constitution above all, the citizen should arm himself with strength and constancy, and say, every day of his life, what a virtuous Count Palatine19 said in the Diet of Poland: Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietum servitium.20

Were there a people of gods, their government would be democratic. So perfect a government is not for men.

This what the evil Obama and his minions believe.

If “We The People” don’t stand up to this evil man we will lose our freedom.

 

 

 

 

 

The Sixties Radical on Obama’s Destruction of The USA

The Democrat Socialist Party repeats the same mantra over and over again.

This goes on ad nauseum.

If it isn’t tax the rich, it is you have to pay your fair share or tax cuts only benefit the rich, or the only reason why we oppose Obama is because he is black, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer it is the USA is a racist nation.

And this is only a small dent in the extensive list of attacks by the Democrat Socialist Party on us conservatives.

The real truth is that the evil Obama and his Marxist ideas are killing this country.

Since he became President unemployment is almost ten percent according to the U.S. government but in actuality it is closer to twenty percent.

Gas prices and food prices have gone through the roof.

The housing market is dead.

Government spending is fourteen trillion dollars and Obama’s answer to these problems is blame all of this on George W. Bush, the Republicans, the evil rich, the bastard oil and gas companies, big fat, big food, Wal-Mart and everyone who makes over 250 grand a year.

This is only a drop in the bucket of Obama is doing to this country.

Try Gay marriage, the banning of the light bulb, what kind of food you can eat or can’t need I say more.

This has been the Democrat Socialist Party’s mantra since the 1900’s.

Nothing much has changed.

These evil people have run out of ideas.

Obama is an evil Marxist who wants to destroy this country and make it in his own image.

He wants to change this country into a totalitarian state that worships at the feet of the Marxist King Obama.

The Democrat Socialist Party is playing the race card and the class envy card because the evil Obama thinks we are stupid and will fall into his trap.

This trap is to entice us to turn total control of our lives and government over to him.

This is what the evil one is banking on.

The evil Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck “YOU” Schumer and the rest think we are stupid.

Our leader think and believe that “We the People” need them to run our lives from womb to tomb.

Without the government we wouldn’t know whether to shit or go sailing in the morning.

Our problems as a country began we kicked the God of The Bible out of our country in 1962.

Since then we have been on a downhill slide to a totalitarian state.

Here is some food for thought.

 Every child in America should be acquainted with his own country. He should read books that furnish him with ideas that will be useful to him in life and practice. As soon as he opens his lips, he should rehearse the history of his own country.

Noah Webster, On the Education of Youth in America, 1788

Every child in America should be acquainted with his own country. He should read books that furnish him with ideas that will be useful to him in life and practice. As soon as he opens his lips, he should rehearse the history of his own country.

Noah Webster, On the Education of Youth in America, 1788

Government, in my humble opinion, should be formed to secure and to enlarge the exercise of the natural rights of its members; and every government, which has not this in view, as its principal object, is not a government of the legitimate kind.

James Wilson, Lectures on Law, 1791

How much more do they deserve our reverence and praise, whose lives are devoted to the formation of institutions, which, when they and their children are mingled in the common dust, may continue to cherish the principles and the practice of liberty in perpetual freshness and vigour.

Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution, 1833

How prone all human institutions have been to decay; how subject the best-formed and most wisely organized governments have been to lose their check and totally dissolve; how difficult it has been for mankind, in all ages and countries, to preserve their dearest rights and best privileges, impelled as it were by an irresistible fate of despotism.

James Monroe, speech in the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 10, 1788

We have to stand up and fight for our freedom. If we don’t we lose. Obama is evil. His ideas and polices have to be destroyed. If Obama wins we will lose everything.

This is includes all you Libs who are follow him like sheep being led to the slaughter.

 

The Sixties Radical on The Real Democcrat Socialist Party Agenda

You just gotta love this Bullshit that is coming out of the White House and the Democrat Socialist Party.

Harry Reid, Man Child President, the evil Little Lord Fauntleroy Obama, and the state run media are throwing a hizzy fit over House Majority leader Eric Cantor who after years of taking the shit that these clowns have been dishing out finally said I have a enough of your crap and told them to go pound sand.

This is about time.

Somebody has to do it so why not Eric Cantor.

Harry Reid etal can do this to the Republicans but how dare someone dare turn the tables on us especially a Jew.

Obama is an anti-Semitic prick.

So are Harry Reid and the rest of them.

You fight fire with fire.

Let me quote a line from The Untouchables- they put one of yours in the hospital you send three of theirs to the morgue.

It comes down to this.

If Speaker of the House John Boehner, Eric Cantor, and Mitch McConnell cave our country is screwed.

Will now become a Marxists society.

The lies are coming out.

The evil one has destroyed the housing industry, the auto industry, the banking industry, and the food industry just to name a few.

We have to stop this evil dead in its tracks.

Lyndon Baines Johnson destroyed the black family in 1965 with the war on poverty.

American’s Christian and Jewish roots upon which this country was founded have been destroyed by the Left, the Democrat Socialist Party, the state run media, the elitist Republicans etal have forced this country to turn its back on the God of The Bible, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

When this happens all hell breaks loose in a society.

It all starts with abandoning of  God.

Then social institutions of the family, education, and  political stones upon which a society is built fall apart the society is doomed.

The last to go is the economic.

This is basic Sociology 101.

Here are some definitions 

A social institution is a complex, integrated set of social norms organized around the preservation of a basic societal value. Obviously, the sociologist does not define institutions in the same way as does the person on the street. Lay persons are likely to use the term “institution” very loosely, for churches, hospitals, jails, and many other things as institutions.

Sociologists often reserve the term “institution” to describe normative systems that operate in five basic areas of life, which may be designated as the primary institutions. (1) In determining Kinship; (2) in providing for the legitimate use of power; (3) in regulating the distribution of goods and services; (4) in transmitting knowledge from one generation to the next; and (5) in regulating our relation to the supernatural. In shorthand form, or as concepts, these five basic institutions are called the family, government, economy, education and religion.

The five primary institutions are found among all human groups. They are not always as highly elaborated or as distinct from one another as into the United States, but, in rudimentary form at last, they exist everywhere. Their universality indicates that they are deeply rooted in human nature and that they are essential in the development and maintenance of orders. Sociologists operating in terms of the functionalist model society have provided the clearest explanation of the functions served by social institutions. Apparently there are certain minimum tasks that must be performed in all human groups. Unless these tasks are performed adequately, the group will cease to exist. An analogy may help to make the point. We might hypothesize that cost accounting department is essential to the operation of a large corporation. A company might procure a superior product and distribute it then at the price which is assigned to it, the company will soon go out of business. Perhaps the only way to avoid this is to have a careful accounting of the cost of each step in the production and distribution process.

A social system basically consists of two or more individuals interacting directly or indirectly in a bounded situation. There may be physical or territorial boundaries, but the fundamental sociological point of reference is that the individuals are oriented, in a whole sense, to a common focus or inter-related foci. Thus it is appropriate to regard such diverse sets of relationships as small groups, political parties and whole societies as social systems. Social systems are open systems, exchanging information with, frequently acting with reference to other systems. Modern conceptions of the term can be traced to the leading social analysts of the nineteenth century, notably Auguste Comte, Karl Marx, Herbert Spencer and Emile Durkheim; each of whom elaborated in some form or other conceptions of the major units of social systems (mainly societies) and the relationships between such units- even though the expression social system was not a key one. Thus, in Marx’s theory, the major units or components of the capitalist societies with which he was principally concerned were socio-economic classes, and the major relationships between classes involved economic and political power.

The most influential conceptualization of the term has been that of Talcott Parsons. Parsons’ devotion to this issue has two main aspects. First, what is called the problem of social order; i.e. the nature of the forces giving rise to relatively stable forms of social interaction and organization, and promoting orderly change. Parsons took Thomas Hobbes Leviathan, 1651, as his point of departure in this part of his analysis. Hobbes had maintained that man’s fundamental motivation was the craving for power and that men were always basically in conflict with each other. Thus order could only exist in strong government. To counter this Parsons invoked the work of Max Weber and, in particular, Durkheim, who had placed considerable emphasis on the functions of normative, factors in social life, such as ideals and values. Factors of this kind came to constitute the mainspring in Parsons Delineation of a social system. Thus in his major theoretical work, The Social system, 1951, he defines a social system as consisting in a plurality of individual actors interacting with each other in a situation which has at least a physical or environmental aspect, actors, who are motivated in terms of a tendency to the optimization of gratification and whose relations to their situations, including each other, is defined and mediated in terms of a system of culturally structured and shared symbols.

The major units of a social system are said to be collectivities and roles (i.e. not individuals as such); and the major patterns or relationships linking these units are values (ends or broad guides to action) and norms (rules governing role performance in the context of system values). Parsons second major interest has been to make sociology more scientific and systematic, by developing abstract conceptions of the social system; one of this points being that even though Weber placed much emphasis upon normative factors as guiding action, there was in Weber’s sociology no elaboration of a theoretically integrated total system of action. Hence the attempt to combine in one framework both a conception of actors in social situations and an overall, highly abstract, outside view of the major factors involved in a social system as a going concern. Various points in Parsons’ formulation have been criticized. Notably, objections have been made to the emphasis upon normative regulation, and it has been alleged that Parsons neglected social conflict under the pressure of his systematic perspective; i.e. pre-occupation with system ness and analytical elegance which blinds the sociologist to disconsensus in real life and spurs him to stress integrative phenomena in his analyses. However, it is widely agreed that sociologists should operate with some clearly defined conception of what constitutes a social system. Thus, for many sociologists the term social system is not by any means restricted to those situations where there is binding normative regulation; but in order to qualify as social system it must involve a common focus, or set of foci, or orientations and a shared mode of communication among a majority of actors. Thus, on this basis there can be a system of conflict.

In the end we as a nation have moved away from the grace of God.

Our Founding fathers knew this.

A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy. While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue then will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader.

Samuel Adams, letter to James Warren, February 12, 1779

A good government implies two things; first, fidelity to the objects of the government; secondly, a knowledge of the means, by which those objects can be best attained.

Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution, 1833

All good men wish the entire abolition of slavery, as soon as it can take place with safety to the public, and for the lasting good of the present wretched race of slaves. The only possible step that could be taken towards it by the convention was to fix a period after which they should not be imported.

Oliver Ellsworth, The Landholder, December 10, 1787

Another not unimportant consideration is, that the powers of the general government will be, and indeed must be, principally employed upon external objects, such as war, peace, negotiations with foreign powers, and foreign commerce. In its internal operations it can touch but few objects, except to introduce regulations beneficial to the commerce, intercourse, and other relations, between the states, and to lay taxes for the common good. The powers of the states, on the other hand, extend to all objects, which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, and liberties, and property of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the state.

Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution, 1833

The truth is we are borrowing 42 cents out of every dollar. This can’t go on.

WE ARE BROKE.

Eric Cantor, John Boehner, and the rest of you Republicans hold firm. Do not take the deal. Push your budget through the House. Cut taxes and spending.

Do away with The EPA, The Department of Education, The Department of Energy, and all the other departments.

Stop the spending.

Just say no.

The lies are being exposed.

The truth shall set you free.

Here’s a nother diddy. The Democrat Socialist Party are pushing for more spending and if the Republicans want to stop government waste and fraud they must give into new taxes and spending.

Part two- The Democrat Socialist party plan B is Mitch McConnell idiotic plan.

Give me a break.

McConnell you are a joke.

How does one compromise with evil?

If good compromises with evil, evil wins.

Can you say Bye-bye USA.