The Sixties Radical Israel is in Grave Danger

While the world is celebrating the fall of Gaddafi this little voice inside of me says this is all a ruse to lull the world to sleep. Once the Western World is lulled into thinking that democracy is achieve in Libya the Iranian led rebels supplied with arms by Russia will take over and turn Libya into a caliphate.

This is the end of game of Iran backed by Russia.

Obama and the rest of the western world leaders celebrate the overthrow of Egypt however this was just a ruse from Al Qaeda, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, and Iran wanted to get their hands on the Egyptians Military.

Look at what is happening in the Gaza Strip.

This is Israel’s southern border.

Is this a coincidence?

No this is a planned action by Iran and the caliphate.

I am willing to bet dollars to holes in a donut on this.

Right now the Middle East is on fire.

Egypt and Libya has fallen.

Next to fall is Syria followed by Yemen and Saudi Arabia.

The purpose of the fall of the Middle East into Caliphate is to wipe the Jews off the face of the earth.

This is prophesized in Ezekiel 38-39.

For more in depth reading please read my blog written on August 22nd.

No state run media outlets have talked about this at all. Fox News is included.

The only Media type to speak and write about the planned purpose of the fall of the Middle East is Glenn Beck. 

Here is a little diddy written by Frank Gaffney JR The Jewish World Review- There are many reasons to be worried about the bridge-leap the Obama administration has just undertaken in its war with Col. Moammar Gadhafi. How it will all end is just one of them.

Particularly concerning is the prospect that what we might call the Gadhafi precedent will be used in the not-too-distant future to justify and threaten the use of U.S. military forces against an American ally: Israel.

Here’s how such a seemingly impossible scenario might eventuate:

It begins with the Palestinian Authority seeking a United Nations Security Council resolution that would recognize its unilateral declaration of statehood. Three top female officials in the Obama administration reprise roles they played in the council’s recent action on Libya: U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice, a vehement critic of Israel, urges that the United States support (or at least not veto) the Palestinians’ gambit. She is supported by the senior director for multilateral affairs at the National Security Council, Samantha Power, who in the past argued for landing a “mammoth force” of American troops to protect the Palestinians from Israel. Ditto Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, whose unalloyed sympathy for the Palestinian cause dates back at least to her days as first lady.

This resolution enjoys the support of the other four veto-wielding Security Council members – Russia, China, Britain and France – as well as all of the other nonpermanent members except India, which joins the United States in abstaining. As a result, it is adopted with overwhelming support from what is known as the “international community.”

With a stroke of the U.N.’s collective pen, substantial numbers of Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and Israeli citizens find themselves on the wrong side of internationally recognized borders. The Palestinian Authority (PA) insists on its long-standing position: The sovereign territory of Palestine must be rid of all Jews.

The Israeli government refuses to evacuate the oft-condemned “settlements” now on Palestinian land or to remove the IDF personnel, checkpoints and facilities rightly seen as vital to protecting their inhabitants and, for that matter, the Jewish state itself.

Hamas and Fatah bury the hatchet (temporarily), forging a united front and promising democratic elections in the new Palestine. There, as in Gaza – and probably elsewhere in the wake of the so-called “Arab awakening” – the winner likely will be the Muslim Brotherhood, whose Palestinian franchise is Hamas.

The unified Palestinian proto-government then seeks international help to “liberate” its land. As with the Gadhafi precedent, the first to act is the Arab League. Its members unanimously endorse the use of force to protect the “Palestinian people” and end the occupation of the West Bank by the Israelis.

Turkey, which is still a NATO ally despite its ever-more-aggressive embrace of Islamism, is joined by Britain and France – two European nations increasingly hostile to Israel – in applauding this initiative in the interest of promoting “peace.” They call on the U.N. Security Council to authorize such steps as might be necessary to enforce the Arab League’s bidding

Once again, Team Obama’s leading ladies – Mrs. Clinton, Ms. Power and Ms. Rice – align to support the “will of the international community.” They exemplify and are prepared to enforce the president’s willingness to subordinate U.S. sovereignty to the dictates of transnationalism and his personal hostility toward Israel. The concerns of Mr. Obama’s political advisers about alienating Jewish voters on the eve of the 2012 election are trumped by presidential sympathy for the Palestinian right to a homeland.

Accordingly, hard as it may be to believe given the United States’ long-standing role as Israel’s principal ally and protector, Mr. Obama acts in accordance with the Gadhafi precedent. He warns Israel that it must take steps immediately to dismantle its unwanted presence inside the internationally recognized state of Palestine lest it face the sort of U.S.- enabled “coalition” military measures now under way in Libya. In this case, they would be aimed at neutralizing IDF forces on the West Bank – and beyond, if necessary – in order to fulfill the “will of the international community.”

Of course, such steps would not result in the ostensibly desired endgame, namely “two states living side by side in peace and security.” If the current attack on Libya entails the distinct possibility of unintended (or at least unforeseen) consequences, application of the Gadhafi precedent to Israel seems certain to produce a very different outcome from the two-state “solution”: Under present and foreseeable circumstances, it will unleash a new regional war, with possible worldwide repercussions.

At the moment, it seems unlikely that the first application in Libya of the Gadhafi precedent will have results consistent with U.S. interests. Even if a positive outcome somehow is forthcoming there, should Mr. Obama and his anti-Israel troika of female advisers be allowed, based on that precedent, to realize the foregoing hypothetical scenario, they surely would precipitate a new international conflagration, one fraught with truly horrific repercussions – for Israel, the United States and freedom-loving people elsewhere.

A Congress that was effectively sidelined by Team Obama in the current crisis had better engage fully, decisively and quickly if it is to head off such a disastrous reprise.

We are in clear and present danger yet Obama, congress and the rest of the nation do not see this.

This is how evil works. It takes an element of truth and twists it all into a pretzel to let you think good is bad and bad is good.

Sure Gaddafi is an evil man yet the ones who are leading this revolution want you and I to think they are doing this for the greater good when in fact this overthrown is a well planned an executed takeover so that Hamas, Iran and the rest of the Muslim world can get their hands on weapons of mass destruction to use against Israel.

You can take that to the bank.

The following skinny is taken from the Jihad Watch- Israel concerned about fate of Assad’s weapons if regime falls.

The U.S. and NATO have already been trying to secure Gadhafi’s arsenal, which includes mustard gas, through the Libyan rebels. The fall of Gadhafi’s and Assad’s regimes could both make for one hellish garage sale for jihadist bargain-hunters. “Mideast Expert: Syria’s WMD Could Fall to Islamists,” by Brett Sandala for NewsMax, August 22:

Israel is “very concerned” over the potential fall of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad, according to Yaakov Katz, Israeli military expert and defense correspondent for the Jerusalem Post.

“All of this extensive, advanced weaponry that Assad has manufactured and hoarded over the past decade will find itself in the hands of people who might even be more radical than Assad, and who don’t have the political calculations that he had.”

In an exclusive Newsmax interview, Katz also suggests a more positive scenario: “If Assad will fall, the supply line to Hezbollah will be cut off and Iran will find itself more isolated without the friend it used to have in Syria. That could be a very good outcome for Israel. At the same time though, Israel is very concerned [that] no one in the world can say who will be the potential successor in Syria.

“[Assad] has an extensive chemical weapons program, and thousands of SCUD missiles . . . that could do a lot of damage against Israel,” Katz says, reasoning that western powers were able to militarily intervene in Libya because, “There was basically no place for Libya to respond to. On the other hand, If the United States or NATO starts to bomb Syria, Assad could fire SCUD missiles into Israel.

“It’s an extremely dangerous time, mostly characterized by uncertainty . . . a level of which hasn’t been seen for years. Israel could find itself as not only the only democracy in the Middle East, but the only country that’s not run by radical Islamists.

“Since the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Israel hasn’t faced enemies on its northern and southern fronts,” says Katz, regarding the tense situation on Israel’s border with Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, where a Palestinian terror attack last week killed eight Israelis and ignited a round of fighting between Israel and Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.

“Sinai has turned into a lawless Wild West of sorts. The Egyptians have completely lost the Sinai and are now trying to restore law and order, and Israel is allowing Egypt to deploy forces inside of the Sinai.”

Per the peace treaty signed between Israel and Egypt in 1979, the peninsula was to remain demilitarized. “Israel is bending the peace treaty to allow them to insert those troops,” Katz explains.

After striking targets in Gaza through the weekend, Israel agreed to a ceasefire on Monday for two reasons, according to Katz: “What happens in Gaza affects Israel’s ties with Egypt. An Israeli onslaught against Gaza today is something the Egyptians refuse to accept.”

Also, “Israel restrained itself to some extent because of the potential diplomatic and international fallout it would face ahead of September,” when the Palestinians plan to ask the United Nations General Assembly to grant statehood to Palestine.

“Gaza today is linked to what’s happening in Egypt, and that’s due to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood is a growing force in Egypt, particularly on the political level . . . [and] is the founding fathers of Hamas.”

The Muslim Brotherhood aren’t the only players behind the scenes, according to Katz: “It’s all under the umbrella of the Islamic regime of Iran.”

“The weaponry comes from Iran, some are produced in Gaza with Iranian tech and know how. The model of the most recent attack [against Israel] was very similar to some IDF officers who are familiar with fighting in Lebanon against Hezbollah . . . It’s almost like they come off the assembly line straight out of Iran

Once again the Word of God is true.

Don’t doubt me.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s