The Sixties Radical-Tom Ridge and Tom Corbett-The Milton Hershey School Sex Scandal Coverup

Since we wrote about the Milton Hershey sex scandal and it’s connection with the Penn State allegations of child abuse and the football program several stories have been written that connect former AG Tom Corbett and now Governor Corbett to cover ups about sex with children and selling children as sex slaves to perverts.

The Harrisburg Patriot published this story written by Sarah Gamin November 13th, 2011.

Click on the link to read the entire story- http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/11/special_report_why_the_jerry_s.html

This is the same AG who dragged his feet when his office was given information in 1998 that house parents were committing child abuse and having sex with children. AG Tom Corbett did nothing,

Mathew Kemeny Harrisburg Patriot wrote this story May 17th 2010.

Here is the link- http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2010/05/cops_abuse_of_milton_hershey_s.html

There is pattern by the Governor and AG’s office to drag their feet and do nothing.

Former Governor Tom Ridge and AG Tom Corbett and now Governor Corbett are talking out of both sides of their mouths.

Let’s remember football is king at Penn State.

The only reason why Governor Corbett and now AG Linda Kelly are making fuss about the Jerry Sandusky case is that the reputation of Penn State football is under attack.

This will cost the school and the state millions of dollars.

Yet when the same thing happened at the Milton Hershey School the entire process was done behind closed doors.

Millions of dollars were taken from the Milton Hershey trust to pay off the families for the crimes committed by Charles Koons and William Chaney.

Both these men were sentenced and are spending time in prison for their crimes.

In the Jerry Sandusky case these are only allegations.

There has not been a trial or a conviction.

Yet this could effect the donations give to the Penn State Milton Hershey Medical Center.

What most folks don’t know is the money to build this Medical Center was taken from the Milton Hershey Trust fund.

Former Governor Tom Ridge is a member of the board.

He approved this money to be used to build the Medical center.

The Milton Hershey Trust was created in 1905. The monies from this trust were to be used to help orphans and this gave birth to the Milton Hershey School.

Here is a story written by Jeffrey Franz- November 24th, 2011- Harrisburg Patriot.

Here is the link to the story- http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/11/penn_state_milton_s_hershey_me_7.html

Here is another link between Milton Hershey and the Penn State scandal. The acting Athletic Director David Joyner is a member of the Milton Hershey Board of Directors.

The Fox News reported this.

Here is the link to the story.

http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2011/11/16/penn-state-names-joyner-acting-ad/

The more one digs into the story the more the connection between Penn State and the Milton Hershey School become apparent.

Yet we have not heard a peep from the National state run media about this.

 

The Sixties Radical- The Light of Truth is Shown on The Evil Ways of Our Leaders

Once again the lairs in Congress and the media are creating a non-existent hysteria. Oh, my God! If we don’t make a deal and pass a budget out of the politburo super committee this nation will see cuts in defense and our social programs like we have never seen before.

For all those who don’t know what a politburo is. This is an executive committee for the communist party.

This is a central planning committee.

This is out of the Marxist-Leninist state.

Obama is taking all of his ideas straight out of the Communist Manifesto and Saul Alinski’s Rules for Radicals.

This is just a little explanation of the terms for everyone.

This is pure bullshit.

Rand Paul let the cat out of the bag. The supposed cuts to the military are not spending cuts but cuts to proposed expenditures.

Finally the truth is coming out yet anyone who listens to Rush Limbaugh and Mark Levin have known this for years.

Here’s the money quote- “I think we need to be honest about it,” Paul said. “The interesting thing is there will be no cuts in military spending. This may surprise some people, but there will be no cuts in military spending because we’re only cutting proposed increases. If we do nothing, military spending goes up 23% over 10 years. If we sequester the money, it will still go up 16%. So spending is still rising under any of these plans. In fact, if you look at both alternatives, spending is still going up. We’re only cutting proposed increases in spending.”

Here is the actual link to the story on Political Tracker CNN- http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2011/11/20/rand-paul-automatic-cuts-may-be-the-only-way/

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta wrote this in a letter to lawmakers. He wrote these potential cuts would be devastating.

This all part and parcel of the fear mongering being spread throughout the country by those in power to make sure we don’t make real cuts but only phantom cuts.

Rand Paul said this about the Panetta statement- “That’s an interpretation,” Paul said. “But what I can tell you … is that defense spending will go up $100 billion over 10 years even if we sequester $600 billion, because the curve of spending in our country is going up at about 7.5% a year. All spending goes up.”

All quotes taken from the Political Tracker-CNN.

Let put all of this in plain and simple English.

You can’t spend what you don’t have.

One can put all expenses and all other charges on the credit card.

The country can postpone the payment for only so long.

Sooner ore later the house of cards will come tumbling down.

The house of cards foundation the Democrat Socialist Party, The Republicans, and the ruling class have built is about to fall.

If we don’t stop this insanity now our country will fall off into the abyss.

This is a true fact.

All one has to do is look at Spain, France, Germany, Italy, Greece, England, and all socialist country’s.

The difference between the Democrat Socialist Party and the elite Republicans is this.

The Dems want to go over the cliff into the abyss 100mph.

The elite ruling class want to go over the cliff into the abyss 60mph.

Guess what?

The country goes into the abyss no matter if it’s 60 or 100mph.

How do we stop this?

Stop spending money you don’t have.

Write and follow a real budget.

Get your collective heads out of your asses and get back our to founding.

Our founding fathers were all believers in God and Jesus.

They founded this country on the word of God, John Locke, and Adam’s Smith Wealth of Nations, and Charles Montesquieu.

Montesquieu wrote the book The Spirit of the Laws in 1750.

He wrote there is three kinds of political systems- a republic, monarchical, and despotic.

Montesquieu also wrote about Political Liberty.

This meant that liberty and democracy are one in the same.

He also wrote about the separation of powers in the government.

This is what our founding fathers used in the writing of the Constitution.

Under this system a government must have civil and criminal laws that will ensure personal security.

In the end man is fallible.

If the King or Queen is given unlimited power the ultimate end is despotism.

This is the direction we are heading.

Obama wants to be King.

Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, John McCain, John Boehner, Chuck Schumer, and the rest view us “We the People” as subjects and peons.

We are too stupid to run our lives without the help of a centralized government telling us how to live.

Can you say the Roman Empire?

The God of the Bible is giving us a warning.

The root of our problems began when we kicked the God of the Bible out of our country in 1962.

Read the Bible and then the Rise and Fall of The Roman Empire.

An society will collapse when it’s moral depravity becomes the norm instead of abnormal.

Try the Ten Commandments.

They work all the time.

Mark Levin summed our plight like this- We are in a post Constitutional state.

The Sixties Radical- The Milton Hershey School sex abuse

Penn State was rocked last week when allegations came out that former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky was sexually abusing little boys. These allegations cost Penn State football coach Joe Paterno and Penn State president Graham Spanier their jobs. Athletic director Tim Curley and Senior Vice-President for Finance and Business Gary Schultz were fired and both men were charged with perjury.

However this is not the real story.

Please let me explain.

A very good friend of mine Harry Chalmers, a graduate of Milton Hershey School turned me on to this story.

I never heard about this story until Harry emailed me last Thursday.

This story was not even reported by the national media.

The school is the Milton Hershey School.

In 2010 Charles Koons was convicted of child molestation. He was sentenced 35-100 years in jail.

Philadelphia Inquirer writer Bob Fernandez wrote this piece on May 10th 2010.

The link to the story is http://www.philly.com/philly/news/homepage/94387849.html

The lead paragraph is this- The Milton Hershey School, the wealthy and nationally acclaimed free boarding school for disadvantaged children, quietly paid $3 million earlier this year to compensate for the sexual abuse suffered by five former students, The Inquirer has learned.

The school confirmed the payments in an interview Wednesday, but it would not disclose the number of recipients or the amount. Those details were provided by two sources, one of them a high-ranking school official.

“We believed what the individuals were alleging. We found it to be true, and we wanted to remediate it,” said Connie McNamara, the Hershey School’s spokeswoman.

Read the entire story by clicking on the above link.

But wait there is more to this Milton Hershey School story.

The Patriot News printed this story by Mathew Kemeny May 17th, 2010.

Four Milton Hershey School students reported being abused to their houseparents in 1989 and at least one of the boys’ mothers reported abuse to Derry Township police in 1998  — years before the abuser was convicted and sentenced to jail, authorities said.

Charles R. Koons II, 40, of Middletown, pleaded guilty in January to sexually assaulting 16 children. He was sentenced in March to 35 to 100 years in prison.

Koons had access to the Milton Hershey students because his mother was a substitute houseparent. Substitute houseparents fill in on campus for regular houseparents when they’re away. 

Milton Hershey has no record of any reports made against Koons in 1989, school spokeswoman Connie McNamara said.

Lt. David Holl, a Derry Twp. police spokesman, said he’s not sure why there wasn’t a follow-up on the initial report. A computer crash at the department 10 years ago prevents him from finding out, he said.

Most of the abuse Koons was convicted of happened after 2002. His victims ranged from 4 to 14 years old and the assaults happened in numerous places, including Koons’ car, a campsite, a hotel near a bowling alley and in a recreational vehicle.

Koons photographed some of the boys and lured some with fireworks, drugs, alcohol and pornography.

This was only the tip of the iceberg.

Bob Fernandez Philadelphia Inquire staff writer wrote this story October 30th, 2011.

The link is http://articles.philly.com/2011-10-30/news/30339167_1_student-homes-milton-hershey-school-sexual-relations

William Charney Jr. walked into the federal courthouse in Harrisburg 10 days ago and was sentenced to more than seven years in prison. The charge: possession of almost 700 images and 40 videos of child pornography.

A vile crime in any circumstance, it is particularly chilling in the case of Charney. The 43-year-old, married and the father of two children, was responsible for the residential life of about 800 teenage students and was living on the campus of the Milton Hershey School for impoverished children. Between 2001 and 2008, Charney and his wife, Mollie, were the house parents for about a dozen boys, living in student homes with them.

Tipped off by America Online, the FBI had cause to move quickly when it first became aware of Charney in late 2009. “Let me know if you ever want to make it happen with one of my boys, they’re always available,” said one e-mail sent to Charney, who used an alias screen name.

Charney is the second child-sex offender uncovered at the Hershey School in recent years and the latest in a string of sexually charged issues to confront the school’s administration and its Board of Managers. It comes as the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office is investigating multimillion-dollar expenditures by the school of funds meant to sustain the institution and expand its enrollment.

Before the Charney case, the most publicized of the sexual improprieties was the school’s decision in 2010 to settle the claims of five former students who said they had been sexually abused by Charles Koons 2d, a serial molester who gained access to the campus through his mother, a part-time house parent. Though a mother of a boy warned the school about Koons in the late 1990s, Koons continued to visit the campus.

Read the entire story by clicking on the above link.

This is where the story gets interesting and the tie to the Penn State scandal will become clear.

Former Pennsylvania Governor Tom Ridge is a Hershey Board of Trustees member and is connected with the payments made in the legal settlements.

Bob Fernandez Philadelphia Inquirer staff reported wrote this story August 25th, 2011.

The link is http://articles.philly.com/2011-08-25/business/29927278_1_foreign-students-summer-work-travel-program-milton-hershey-school/2

Here is the money quote- Former Gov. Tom Ridge is a member of the candy company board, earning about $200,000 a year in directors’ fees. Former Attorney General LeRoy S. Zimmerman was a director on the candy company’s board before stepping down earlier this year. Zimmerman, one of the state’s most powerful Republicans, remains chairman of the Hershey charity that controls the candy company.

To read the entire story click on the link listed above.

Current Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett was the PA Attorney General at the time. He was investigating The Milton Hershey School for out of control spending.

See the link http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10355/1112323-454.stm

Story Bob Fernandez December 10th, 2010.

The issue is the trust’s $12 million purchase in 2006 of a money-losing golf course north of Hershey with funds intended to educate impoverished children and increase enrollment at the acclaimed Milton S. Hershey School. After acquiring the golf course, the charity embellished the Wren Dale course with the construction of a Scottish-style clubhouse and restaurant-bar, at a price of $5 million, again with funds meant for the Hershey School.

Read the entire story by clinking on the above link.

The current PA Attorney General Linda Kelly is in charge of over seeing the Milton Hershey School Trust and Board of Trustees.

These are the same people that are up in arms about what happened at Penn State. Yet when it came to protecting the children and the Milton Hershey School all these kids got was lip service.

Sure the Milton Hershey School is not a football school like Penn State so where is the cry to protect and fire the people that allowed these sexual predators to prey on innocent kids?

How come heads didn’t roll at the Milton Hershey School?

The national media and ESPN have focused on the Penn State scandal because its major source of revenue is football. Penn State is a big power in college football since the early 1960’s.

The Milton Hershey School isn’t.

What has become abundantly clear is that the legal system dropped the ball.

The governor and attorney general both flew to Penn State to make sure they were where in front of the cameras to show the world that they were on top of this problem.

What happened when the Milton Hershey School story broke Governor Tom Ridge and Attorney General Tom Corbett were nowhere to be found.

These bastions of justice and outrage were completely silent.

When now Governor Tom Corbett and now Attorney General Linda Kelly were approached by members of the Milton Hershey School they were told “We will investigate.”

Translation-go pound sand.

There were two convictions in the Milton Hershey School case.

At Penn State all we have are charges.

There has not been a trial or a conviction in Jerry Sandusky case.

Once again neither the media nor the politicians get it. They cry about injustice and protecting the innocent yet when push comes to shove the real victims get the bums rush.

The Sixties Radical-

We have a mad man building nukes in Iran.  Ahmadinejad is in the process to blow Israel off the face of the earth. And what are we concentrating on in this country?

Pure bullshit.

The top story is the bogus Herman Cain sex charges led by the head fool Gloria Allred and her parade of lairs. The state run lap dog media, the left, the elite Republicans, fake conservatives like Karl Rove, Charles Krauthammer, Bill Kristol, and the rest stoops want to destroy Herman Cain and conservatives.

These jokers think this is business as usual.

It isn’t.

Yo dummies, we have real problems in this country.

We have a President who is ripping to shreds the Constitution. Obama is ruling by executive fait. He is by passing congress and writing laws through executive orders.

We have an attorney General Eric Holder who sold guns to Mexican drug Cartels to destroy the Second Amendment.

See look at what these people are doing. They are getting guns and using them to kill people.

However the hidden fact was that Eric Holder and with knowledge and the okay from Obama sold the guns to the cartels.

Holder and Obama wanted to blame the drug cartels getting guns on the conservatives and gun shops in Arizona and this would lead the people to klammer for gun control.

This was done under the radar to bring about gun control.

Here are some quotes from our founding fathers on this subject-

“Laws that forbid the carrying of arms…disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes…Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”

-Thomas Jefferson, quoting Cesare Beccaria.

“…arms…discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. …Horrid mischief would ensue were (the law-abiding) deprived the use of them.”

-Thomas Paine.

“To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them…”

-Richard Henry Lee writing in Letters from the Federal Farmer to the Republic (1787-1788).

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms has been recognized by the General Government; but the best security of that right after all is, the military spirit, that taste for martial exercises, which has always distinguished the free citizens of these States…Such men form the best barrier to the liberties of America.”

-Gazette of the United States, October 14, 1789.

James Madison wrote the Federalist Paper 46-

RESUMING the subject of the last paper, I proceed to inquire whether the federal government or the State governments will have the advantage with regard to the predilection and support of the people. Notwithstanding the different modes in which they are appointed, we must consider both of them as substantially dependent on the great body of the citizens of the United States. I assume this position here as it respects the first, reserving the proofs for another place. The federal and State governments are in fact but different agents and trustees of the people, constituted with different powers, and designed for different purposes. The adversaries of the Constitution seem to have lost sight of the people altogether in their reasonings on this subject; and to have viewed these different establishments, not only as mutual rivals and enemies, but as uncontrolled by any common superior in their efforts to usurp the authorities of each other. These gentlemen must here be reminded of their error. They must be told that the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone, and that it will not depend merely on the comparative ambition or address of the different governments, whether either, or which of them, will be able to enlarge its sphere of jurisdiction at the expense of the other. Truth, no less than decency, requires that the event in every case should be supposed to depend on the sentiments and sanction of their common constituents.

Many considerations, besides those suggested on a former occasion, seem to place it beyond doubt that the first and most natural attachment of the people will be to the governments of their respective States. Into the administration of these a greater number of individuals will expect to rise. From the gift of these a greater number of offices and emoluments will flow. By the superintending care of these, all the more domestic and personal interests of the people will be regulated and provided for. With the affairs of these, the people will be more familiarly and minutely conversant. And with the members of these, will a greater proportion of the people have the ties of personal acquaintance and friendship, and of family and party attachments; on the side of these, therefore, the popular bias may well be expected most strongly to incline.

Experience speaks the same language in this case. The federal administration, though hitherto very defective in comparison with what may be hoped under a better system, had, during the war, and particularly whilst the independent fund of paper emissions was in credit, an activity and importance as great as it can well have in any future circumstances whatever. It was engaged, too, in a course of measures which had for their object the protection of everything that was dear, and the acquisition of everything that could be desirable to the people at large. It was, nevertheless, invariably found, after the transient enthusiasm for the early Congresses was over, that the attention and attachment of the people were turned anew to their own particular governments; that the federal council was at no time the idol of popular favor; and that opposition to proposed enlargements of its powers and importance was the side usually taken by the men who wished to build their political consequence on the prepossessions of their fellow-citizens.

If, therefore, as has been elsewhere remarked, the people should in future become more partial to the federal than to the State governments, the change can only result from such manifest and irresistible proofs of a better administration, as will overcome all their antecedent propensities. And in that case, the people ought not surely to be precluded from giving most of their confidence where they may discover it to be most due; but even in that case the State governments could have little to apprehend, because it is only within a certain sphere that the federal power can, in the nature of things, be advantageously administered.

The remaining points on which I propose to compare the federal and State governments, are the disposition and the faculty they may respectively possess, to resist and frustrate the measures of each other.

It has been already proved that the members of the federal will be more dependent on the members of the State governments, than the latter will be on the former. It has appeared also, that the prepossessions of the people, on whom both will depend, will be more on the side of the State governments, than of the federal government. So far as the disposition of each towards the other may be influenced by these causes, the State governments must clearly have the advantage. But in a distinct and very important point of view, the advantage will lie on the same side. The prepossessions, which the members themselves will carry into the federal government, will generally be favorable to the States; whilst it will rarely happen, that the members of the State governments will carry into the public councils a bias in favor of the general government. A local spirit will infallibly prevail much more in the members of Congress, than a national spirit will prevail in the legislatures of the particular States. Every one knows that a great proportion of the errors committed by the State legislatures proceeds from the disposition of the members to sacrifice the comprehensive and permanent interest of the State, to the particular and separate views of the counties or districts in which they reside. And if they do not sufficiently enlarge their policy to embrace the collective welfare of their particular State, how can it be imagined that they will make the aggregate prosperity of the Union, and the dignity and respectability of its government, the objects of their affections and consultations? For the same reason that the members of the State legislatures will be unlikely to attach themselves sufficiently to national objects, the members of the federal legislature will be likely to attach themselves too much to local objects. The States will be to the latter what counties and towns are to the former. Measures will too often be decided according to their probable effect, not on the national prosperity and happiness, but on the prejudices, interests, and pursuits of the governments and people of the individual States. What is the spirit that has in general characterized the proceedings of Congress? A perusal of their journals, as well as the candid acknowledgments of such as have had a seat in that assembly, will inform us, that the members have but too frequently displayed the character, rather of partisans of their respective States, than of impartial guardians of a common interest; that where on one occasion improper sacrifices have been made of local considerations, to the aggrandizement of the federal government, the great interests of the nation have suffered on a hundred, from an undue attention to the local prejudices, interests, and views of the particular States. I mean not by these reflections to insinuate, that the new federal government will not embrace a more enlarged plan of policy than the existing government may have pursued; much less, that its views will be as confined as those of the State legislatures; but only that it will partake sufficiently of the spirit of both, to be disinclined to invade the rights of the individual States, or the preorgatives of their governments. The motives on the part of the State governments, to augment their prerogatives by defalcations from the federal government, will be overruled by no reciprocal predispositions in the members.

Were it admitted, however, that the Federal government may feel an equal disposition with the State governments to extend its power beyond the due limits, the latter would still have the advantage in the means of defeating such encroachments. If an act of a particular State, though unfriendly to the national government, be generally popular in that State and should not too grossly violate the oaths of the State officers, it is executed immediately and, of course, by means on the spot and depending on the State alone. The opposition of the federal government, or the interposition of federal officers, would but inflame the zeal of all parties on the side of the State, and the evil could not be prevented or repaired, if at all, without the employment of means which must always be resorted to with reluctance and difficulty. On the other hand, should an unwarrantable measure of the federal government be unpopular in particular States, which would seldom fail to be the case, or even a warrantable measure be so, which may sometimes be the case, the means of opposition to it are powerful and at hand. The disquietude of the people; their repugnance and, perhaps, refusal to co-operate with the officers of the Union; the frowns of the executive magistracy of the State; the embarrassments created by legislative devices, which would often be added on such occasions, would oppose, in any State, difficulties not to be despised; would form, in a large State, very serious impediments; and where the sentiments of several adjoining States happened to be in unison, would present obstructions which the federal government would hardly be willing to encounter.

But ambitious encroachments of the federal government, on the authority of the State governments, would not excite the opposition of a single State, or of a few States only. They would be signals of general alarm. Every government would espouse the common cause. A correspondence would be opened. Plans of resistance would be concerted. One spirit would animate and conduct the whole. The same combinations, in short, would result from an apprehension of the federal, as was produced by the dread of a foreign, yoke; and unless the projected innovations should be voluntarily renounced, the same appeal to a trial of force would be made in the one case as was made in the other. But what degree of madness could ever drive the federal government to such an extremity. In the contest with Great Britain, one part of the empire was employed against the other. The more numerous part invaded the rights of the less numerous part. The attempt was unjust and unwise; but it was not in speculation absolutely chimerical. But what would be the contest in the case we are supposing? Who would be the parties? A few representatives of the people would be opposed to the people themselves; or rather one set of representatives would be contending against thirteen sets of representatives, with the whole body of their common constituents on the side of the latter.

The only refuge left for those who prophesy the downfall of the State governments is the visionary supposition that the federal government may previously accumulate a military force for the projects of ambition. The reasonings contained in these papers must have been employed to little purpose indeed, if it could be necessary now to disprove the reality of this danger. That the people and the States should, for a sufficient period of time, elect an uninterupted succession of men ready to betray both; that the traitors should, throughout this period, uniformly and systematically pursue some fixed plan for the extension of the military establishment; that the governments and the people of the States should silently and patiently behold the gathering storm, and continue to supply the materials, until it should be prepared to burst on their own heads, must appear to every one more like the incoherent dreams of a delirious jealousy, or the misjudged exaggerations of a counterfeit zeal, than like the sober apprehensions of genuine patriotism. Extravagant as the supposition is, let it however be made. Let a regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country, be formed; and let it be entirely at the devotion of the federal government; still it would not be going too far to say, that the State governments, with the people on their side, would be able to repel the danger. The highest number to which, according to the best computation, a standing army can be carried in any country, does not exceed one hundredth part of the whole number of souls; or one twenty-fifth part of the number able to bear arms. This proportion would not yield, in the United States, an army of more than twenty-five or thirty thousand men. To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. It may well be doubted, whether a militia thus circumstanced could ever be conquered by such a proportion of regular troops. Those who are best acquainted with the last successful resistance of this country against the British arms, will be most inclined to deny the possibility of it. Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to possess the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite of the legions which surround it. Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion, that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession, than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors. Let us rather no longer insult them with the supposition that they can ever reduce themselves to the necessity of making the experiment, by a blind and tame submission to the long train of insidious measures which must precede and produce it.

The argument under the present head may be put into a very concise form, which appears altogether conclusive. Either the mode in which the federal government is to be constructed will render it sufficiently dependent on the people, or it will not. On the first supposition, it will be restrained by that dependence from forming schemes obnoxious to their constituents. On the other supposition, it will not possess the confidence of the people, and its schemes of usurpation will be easily defeated by the State governments, who will be supported by the people.

On summing up the considerations stated in this and the last paper, they seem to amount to the most convincing evidence, that the powers proposed to be lodged in the federal government are as little formidable to those reserved to the individual States, as they are indispensably necessary to accomplish the purposes of the Union; and that all those alarms which have been sounded, of a meditated and consequential annihilation of the State governments, must, on the most favorable interpretation, be ascribed to the chimerical fears of the authors of them.

We have a government that is power mad.

The evil Obama wants to make slaves and servants of us all.

The country is broke.

We are spending money faster than it can be print.

All of this is done in the name of progress and compassion.

Tax the rich.

Tax the poor.

Tax everyone so the Unions will be paid off.

The evil Obama and the Democrat Socialist Party are using state and federal unions as well as all state workers and federal workers as a money-laundering scheme to keep the status que.

Ohio fell for this straw dog argument.

If you limited state unions and their pensions and force these leaches to pay for health care you will cause all cops and firefighters to be laid off and the result will be chaos.

Here’s a news flash fools.

Who the fuck do think pays for all of these.

We do!

We The People are broke.

We don’t have the money.

We are having trouble feeding our families, paying our mortgages, car payments, and healthcare.

Food, gas, clothing, and everyday expenses are going through the roof.

Why?

The evil Obama has killed private sector jobs and the housing market.

We the people are stuck with the bill.

This country is on the precipice. One step and we are toast.

The Democrat Socialist Party is going over the cliff at 100 mph.

The elite Republicans only want to go over the cliff at sixty mph.

Here’s a dose of reality it doesn’t matter if one goes over the cliff and 100 or 60 mph you still go over the cliff.

Kaboom Baby.

We are dead meat.

The Sixties Radical- God is Giving us a Huge Warning

This garbage never ends. Mark Levin said in his radio show last week that Gloria Allred should get involved. Guess what? The Lib lawyer is now involved in the Herman Cain bullshit attempt to destroy this man.

She is the same fool that brought charges against Meg Whitman for hiring an illegal maid Nicky Diaz and then fired her.

Allred was dead center of these bullshit charges.

All of this happened in September of 2010.

Allred charged she knowingly hired this illegal.

All of these charges made by Allred turned out to be bogus.

TMZ reported the real truth.

The documents, which Whitman claims Nicky filled out and signed back in 2000 during her application for employment, appear to show that the maid stated under the penalty of perjury that she was a “lawful permanent resident” of the United States.

Whitman also claims Nicky provided her with a social security card and valid California Driver’s License with her employment application … which Meg kept and has now handed over to TMZ.

Whitman has also issued a statement on the matter, saying … “After 9 years of faithful service, Nicky came to us in June 2009 and confessed that she was an illegal worker.”  Whitman continues, “Nicky has falsified the hiring documents and personal information she provided to the employment agency that brought her to us in 2000.”

And, Whitman continues, “I believe Nicky is being manipulated by Gloria Allred for political and financial purposes during the last few weeks of a hotly contested election.”

Whitman concludes, “This is a shameful example of the politics of personal destruction practiced by people like Jerry Brown and Gloria Allred.  The charges are without merit.”

I smell a rat.

This all about destroying this Black man.

Does Clarence Thomas ring a familiar note?

Anytime Politico, Gloria Allred or any other Lib is connected with a story you know it is pure Bullshit.

These people lie.

What took you so long Condoleeszza Rice to speak about what is going on in Iran and the racist anti-semantic prick Obama?  

No shit Sherlock.

What do you think they were building? 

A playhouse for kids.

A huge Come on Man goes out to Rice.

 The Greek President was forced to resign because he and his fools are spending their country into the next Millennium.

Italy is next on the chopping block.

Spain is broke as well as all of Europe.

The evil Obama is using these countries as a model to destroy this great country of ours.

I know this is all over the place

But hey it’s a Monday.

God is speaking to us through the Tea Party.

Stop spending money you don’t have now.

Make real cuts.

I have a novel idea.

Use a budget that uses as a baseline money that is taken in.

Spend money you actually have.

Then after it’s gone don’t spend anymore.

In the real world we have to this all the time.

Please point out to me where in the Constitution where all of this spending is permitted on social programs and all of that.

Please don’t use the lame argument the general welfare clause.

This is a straw dog argument.

False as hell.

Besides the general welfare clause doesn’t trump the rest of the Constitution.
Our country is broke.

We are morally corrupt.

We are spending money like a bunch of drunken Marxists and now the Democrat Socialist Party, the Left, the Libs, the elite Republicans, and other wanta bees tell us we need to tax everyone into hell as well as their kids and their grand children to stimulate the economy.

We’ve spend fourteen trillion bucks so far.

We are still in the shits so what is another six or seven trillion?

If we don’t fix this mess NOW this country is fucked big time.

And we fall the rest of the world is fucked também.

We the People get it.

The professional political class and the elites don’t get it.

Actually they do for they want to rule us all.

It is all about power.

We are the servants.

They are our masters.

Government is the new God.

The Bible is very clear.

Thou salt have no other God’s before me.

Look to our own conceit and you will see the seeds of our very destruction.

My people the Jews found out the hard way.

Read the Bible.

Our history is laid out for the entire world to see.

God’s word is true.

Think about it.

The answers will come if your own house is in order.

The Sixties Radical- The Dumb Assed Media- Seek and Destroy a Black Man Instead of Talking About Our Real Problems

Once again the news coming out of Israel is being ignored by the state run media. My people are in process of protecting themselves from the aggressor Iran back by Russia.

No one wants to listen to me.

Russia is supplying Iran with the technology and parts to build a nuclear bomb.

On the southern front Israel has been under constant attack from Hamas through Egypt.

These folks are using weapons taken from the Egyptian army.

All of this has taken place since January 2011.

Libya was the last to fall into the hands of caliphate.

All of Libya’s weapons of mass destruction – ie chemical weapons are now missing.

No shit Sherlock.

This is what this whole mess is about.

Kill Gaddafi and then return Libya to the Muslim fold.

Now Libya will institute Sharia Law.

Another one bites the dust.

Syria is next on the hit list.

Once all of the Middle East is back to its Muslim roots then this Iranian backed coalition will attack Israel.

This was the central theme to the Middle East revolution.

The anti-semantic prick in the White House Obama knew this the entire time.

Obama lied.

Europe and the rest of the western world knows the truth too.

The Bible prophesized all of these events that are taking place in the world.

God’s word is true.

Don’t doubt me.

The Guardian UK wrote this- http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/02/israeli-army-test-fires-missile?newsfeed=true

Israel has successfully test-fired a missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead and striking Iran, fanning a public debate over whether the country’s leaders are agitating for a military attack on Tehran’s atomic facilities.

While Israeli leaders have long warned that a military strike was an option, the most intensive round of public discourse on the subject was ignited over the weekend by a report in the Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronot that said the prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, and the defence minister, Ehud Barak, favoured an attack.

That was followed by a report in the Haaretz on Wednesday that Netanyahu is lobbying cabinet members for an attack, despite the complexity of the operation and the likelihood it would draw a deadly retaliation from Iran. An Israeli official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Netanyahu did not yet have a majority.

An Israeli defence official told the Associated Press that the military tested a “rocket propulsion system” in an exercise planned long ago.Further information about the test was censored by the military. Foreign reports, however, said the military test-fired a long-range Jericho missile – capable of carrying a nuclear warhead and striking Iran.

Israel considers Iran its most dangerous threat. It cites Tehran’s nuclear programme, its ballistic missile development, repeated references by the Iranian leader to Israel’s destruction and Iran’s support for anti-Israel militant groups Hamas and Hezbollah.

Iran denies allegations that it aims to produce a bomb, saying its nuclear programme is meant only to produce energy for the oil-rich country. It has blamed Israel for disruptions in the programme, including the assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists and a computer virus that wiped out some of Iran’s nuclear centrifuges.

Israeli National News wrote this- http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/149350

Israel successfully test-fired a  “ballistic missile” that could be used to strike Iran, Israel Radio reported Wednesday. Further information about the test was censored by the military. Foreign reports, however, said the military test-fired a long-range missile – capable of carrying a nuclear warhead and striking Iran. Development of the multi-staged missile was begun in 2008 using the operational Jericho III missile as a base, which defense officials said at the time would be capable of carrying “conventional or unconventional payloads.” A US Congressional report on the Jericho initiative in 2004 estimated Israel’s plans to develop a ballsitic missile would give Israel the ability to deliver a payload of 1,000-1,300 kilograms to anywhere in the Middle East, Europe, Africa, Asia and most of North America.

The western world is going nuts but here’s a dose of reality. My people are only doing what one does when one is under threat. One doesn’t sit back pick their nose and do nothing. One defends themselves when one knows the enemy wants to wipe you off the face of the earth.

The evil Obama knows the real lay of the land and somehow I half suspect he knew that Israel would take action.

I think America is counting on Israel to strike Iran and prevent the evil Iranian leaders from wiping all Jews and the western world off the face of the earth.

The world has been warned many years ago when Khameini said he would wipe all Jews off the face of the earth.

Isreal National News  reported this story- http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/149349

Iran would cause serious damage to the United States and Israel should Jewish state strike the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program, Iran’s top military official said on Wednesday. The “Zionist regime’s military attack against Iran would lead to heavy damages to the US as well as [to the] Zionist regime,” Iran’s Chief of Staff Maj.-Gen. Hassan Fayrouz Abadi said Iran would attack Israel in a “surprising” way, he was quoted by Army Radio as saying.