Tag Archives: Communism

The Sixties Radical-Azriel

Some short pearls of wisdom from my class on the Tanya with Rabbi Gordon.

May he be a blessed memory.

There is a difference between meeting and calling.

Calling means G-d speaks to you.

This means you are part of the plan.

You are partnering with G-d.

Meeting means it is accident.

It means it happened.

It is a coincidence.

The Sixties Radical-Azriel

These are some of the things I have learned in my Tanya Classes with Rabbi Gordon.

The purpose of man is to do mitzvah and study Torah.

Our priority is action.

Mind is over matter.

The brain and mind controls the heart.

Mind controls all limbs.

We Jews create through mediation, study of Torah and contemplation an intellectual love for G-d.

We can choose what to study.

We can choose what to focus on and this will lead us to spirituality.

Do we control the delight or does the delight control us?

The only way I can change is if I have a broken heart.

I must admit that I need Teshuvah (repentance).

When I go into exile I drag G-d into the pits of exile with me and HIS good name is sullied.

When I sin, I must return to Hashem.

Judaism is accessible to every Jew.

We can develop a love for G-d. It is doable.

Why are people desirable of seven-layer cake? This is what makes us tick.

An Evil person even when he is alive he is dead.

Animal sacrifice is only accidental inadvertent sin.

What do we bring to G-d for intentional sin?

A broken heart that is the offering we bring to G-d.

There is nothing as whole as a broken heart.

A broken heart is a whole complete entity.

When I sin, I must first have a broken heart before I can come back to HaShem.

I don’t want to be a prisoner to sin.

The Sixties Radical-Azriel

G-d is showing the light on all of the evil that has been going on in the USA. Americans can no longer use the excuse: “My eyes are wide shut and I don’t see what is really going on.”

G-d will use who HE wants to bring about change and shine HIS light of truth for all of us to see the real truth.

I found this little diddy on Mark Levin’s website http://www.marklevinshow.com/

The Nation Review Andrew McCarthy wrote:” What he said was probably true, but what he didn’t say was more revealing. In Monday’s Morning Jolt, Jim Geraghty usefully outlined some intriguing statements made by former Obama national intelligence director James Clapper regarding the FISA surveillance controversy.

Clapper’s remarks, in an interview by NBC’s Chuck Todd on Meet the Press on Sunday, are being taken as a blanket denial of the allegations that the Obama administration used the Justice Department and FBI to investigate Trump-campaign figures, potentially including Trump himself.

I’m going to assume the truth of General Clapper’s statements. Understandably, many commentators stress that, in the past, he has been caught testifying to things that were untrue (denying bulk metadata collection by intelligence agencies) or ridiculous (asserting that the Muslim Brotherhood is “largely secular”). Making false or misleading statements under oath is serious business, so obviously this history weighs on Clapper’s credibility.

Still, I’ve never believed he was fundamentally a shady character. On the metadata issue, he gave an untrue answer to a senator who intentionally asked an unfair question about classified information in a public setting (though that, of course, is no justification for answering falsely). On the Muslim Brotherhood, he was dutifully toeing the Obama line — not admirable, but not shocking. Those things aside, Clapper is a longtime soldier and intelligence pro, generally well regarded by his peers. I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt that, in the Sunday interview, he was trying in good faith to walk the difficult tightrope of answering questions accurately while not compromising sensitive or classified information.

Now, before parsing General Clapper’s statements, let’s rehearse the allegations that have been made about Obama-administration investigative activity against the Trump circle — understanding (as I underscored in yesterday’s column) that we are necessarily speculating based on reporting that we cannot verify because the relevant documents (if they exist) have not been disclosed.

The claim pertinent to Clapper’s interview is that the Obama Justice Department went to the FISA court in June 2016 with a broad warrant that may have focused on a server in Trump Tower, may have “named” Donald Trump (but not necessarily targeted him for surveillance), and did target a number of Trump’s associates. The FISA court is said to have denied the warrant — meaning there was no eavesdropping authority, so presumably no wiretapping was done. Later, in October, the Obama Justice Department is said to have presented the FISA court a narrower application that did not mention Trump but did target some of his associates. That application is said to have been granted.

The existence of neither application has been confirmed, but the evidence is stronger on the latter. As I excerpted in the column, the New York Times reported in mid-January that the FBI was conducting a “counter-intelligence” investigation (which very likely means a FISA investigation), in which it was reviewing “intercepted communications” of Trump associates (Paul Manafort, Roger Stone, and Carter Page are mentioned). Having first titillated readers with the specter of Trump-campaign collusion with Russia, the Times ultimately conceded that the investigation may have had nothing to do with Trump, the Trump campaign, the 2016 election, or the Putin regime’s hacking of e-mail accounts; it may instead relate to the Trump associates’ business dealings with persons and entities connected to Russia. With that as background, let’s parse Clapper’s statements as Jim outlines them.

Clapper Statement: For the part of the national-security apparatus that Clapper oversaw, “there was no such wiretap activity mounted against the president, the president-elect at the time, or as a candidate, or against his campaign.”

Me: The director of national intelligence does not “oversee” the entirety of the government’s national-security apparatus. By statute, for example, the attorney general (who of course runs the Justice Department) oversees the process of requesting and executing electronic surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (see Title 50 U.S. Code, Sec. 1801 et seq.). Nevertheless, though he would not have overseen it, I assume Clapper would have been aware of any FISA wiretap activity targeting Donald Trump.

Other than Trump’s tweet (which I do not mean to minimize), there has been no allegation that Trump himself was wiretapped. The claim is that there was a FISA application in June 2016, in which the Justice Department sought to wiretap some of Trump’s associates and perhaps Trump himself (it is not clear that Trump was targeted; he was allegedly “named”). If there was a June application, it is said to have been denied by the FISA court. Therefore, wiretapping would not have been conducted as result of it. And obviously, Trump was neither president nor president-elect at that time — he was a candidate running for president.

As for the assertion that there was no wiretapping “against [Trump’s] campaign,” the claims about wiretapping have never focused on the campaign qua campaign. The claim has been that associates of Trump with varying degrees of connection to the campaign and/or to a Trump Tower server were targeted for surveillance and wiretapped.

Clapper Statement: When NBC’s Chuck Todd asked him whether he could confirm or deny whether there existed a FISA court authorization for surveillance of Trump as a candidate or of Trump’s campaign, Clapper declared, “I can deny it.”

Me: Again, the media reporting indicates that the only FISA application “naming” Trump was denied by the FISA court (i.e., the alleged June application). Thus, no one has been alleging that there is a FISA order authorizing the electronic surveillance of Trump or his campaign (as opposed to surveillance of some of Trump’s associates who had attenuated ties to the campaign). Even Trump’s tweets, alleging that he had been wiretapped, did not claim there was a FISA court authorization for this alleged tapping.

Clapper Statement: Asked again whether there was a FISA court order to monitor Trump Tower, Clapper said, “Not to my knowledge.

For example, Paul Manafort, a Trump associate whose communications were reportedly intercepted by the government at some point, lived in Trump Tower, and until August, he was chairman of the Trump campaign headquartered in Trump Tower. If there were, say, FISA authorizations to monitor his cell phone, they would likely have resulted in monitoring at Trump Tower. In addition, there have been at least some suggestions that former national-security adviser Michael Flynn was at Trump Tower (where much of the transition activity took place) when he made the phone calls and wrote texts to Russian ambassador Sergei Kislyak. Undisputed reporting indicates that the December call to Kislyak that ultimately led to Flynn’s dismissal was intercepted and eavesdropped on by the FBI. I strongly suspect that this is because the FBI, under FISA, was monitoring the phone of Kislyak. So even if neither Flynn nor Trump Tower was targeted for FISA surveillance, it may well be that some of Flynn’s communications from Trump Tower was targeted for FISA surveillance, it may well be that some of Flynn’s communications from Trump Tower were intercepted pursuant to court-authorized FISA surveillance.

In sum, and scrutinized carefully, General Clapper’s statements do not refute the claim that the Obama Justice Department sought and obtained FISA surveillance authorization targeting associates of then-candidate Donald Trump — associates who were connected to his campaign to varying degrees. And bear in mind that while the media and Democrats are now using Clapper’s statements to try to downplay Obama-administration investigation efforts against Trump associates, they were very content for the last four months to have Americans believe an aggressive investigation was underway. As I explained in yesterday’s column, fueling the public perception that Trump and his campaign were under investigation has been essential to propping up the false narrative of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Putin regime to “hack the election.”

There’s also this rather important, seemingly blanket denial of collusion from Clapper: Clapper was also asked on “Meet the Press” if he had any evidence that the Trump campaign was colluding with the Russian government while the Kremlin was working to influence the election. “Not to my knowledge,” Clapper said, based on the information he had before his time in the position ended. I’m betting that if the United States government ever actually had evidence of such an earth-shattering conspiracy, the director of national intelligence would have known about it.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/445588/james-clapper-trump-statements-reveal-omission

One quick note. If you think this is only about the unG-dly you are wrong. This light of truth is shown on G-d’s house too.

We need to get our house in order first before we can show the light of G-d’s service and love  to  the rest of the world.

The Sixties Radical-Azriel

G-d is using Donald Trump to expose all of the evil, lies, deceit, and diabolical actions of the government, media,  and social institutions.

G-d is bringing the blinding light of truth to all of the actions of the men and women who are in charge of these institutions.

Why?

Instead of rolling over and playing dead and accepting all of this garbage Trump is fighting back.

We Jews are fighters.

We are taught to fight against all of the evil that attacks the G-d of my father’s, the one true G-d of Avraham, Yitz’chak and Ya’akov, family,  Israel, and to make what is wrong right in the eyes of G-d.

This following story was taken from Mark Levin’s website http://www.marklevinshow.com/

Daniel Horowitz The Conservative Review wrote this piece.

“Amidst the national debate over the deep state embedded in the intelligence bureaucracies sabotaging the Trump presidency, career DHS officials came out with a report trying to undermine the president’s immigration moratorium from high-risk countries.

The report, which was conveniently leaked to MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow last week, elicited the following headlines from the liberal media:

“In leaked document, the case for Trump’s ‘Muslim ban’ takes another huge hit” (Greg Sargent, Washington Post).

“DHS report undermines President Trump’s travel ban: Most foreign-born terrorists become radicalized in the US” (Salon.com).

“Homeland Security Still Doesn’t Think Donald Trump’s Immigration Order Will Work” (Huffington Post).

To begin with, if such a high-profile DHS intel report was leaked to MSNBC, why was the individual responsible for it not fired over the weekend?

Where is DHS Sec. John Kelly? He was one of the first members of the Cabinet to be confirmed and should already have control over the department. Moreover, the eight-page report actually proves the thesis we’ve formulated since my column began here at CR.

Here is the punchline of the report: “We assess that most foreign-born, US-based violent extremists likely radicalized several years after their entry to the United States, limiting the ability of screening and vetting officials to prevent their entry because of national security concerns.”

There you have it, folks! What this means is that the immigration threat from the Middle East is even more severe than what Trump is making it out to be, not less problematic. His detractors are trying to use this report, and clearly it was published and leaked under such a premise — to show that there is no way to vet individuals for terror links. As such, they contend that the immigration moratorium is worthless.

This is a classic straw man argument. In fact, the report demonstrates why only a moratorium can help.

As we’ve said ad nauseam, the problem we face with mass migration from the Middle East is a lot more ubiquitous than a mere few individuals with known ties to official terror groups. It is a civilization problem – importing mass numbers of Sharia-adherent immigrants to the West who will then cluster in communities and cultivate a climate that sows resentment for the host country among their children. This is the enduring lesson of Europe, and yes, this is the reality demonstrated by the 88 cases of radicalized Muslim immigrant families analyzed by this DHS report.

When most of these terrorists came to the U.S. at a young age, they probably looked as cute as any other kid. There was nothing to vet … other than the parents adhering fervently to Shariah. What history has demonstrated is that the parents who are focused on settling down usually do not commit terror attacks. For example, the father will open up a deli shop in Dearborn, Mich., or Brooklyn, for example, and live a pretty quiet life. However, they will raise their kids under a culture that, by and large, is incompatible with western values. This sows resentment among the younger generation, which becomes even more disenchanted with the host country (particularly with the advent of cyber-jihad.

This is the story of the Chattanooga shooter who was brought here from Kuwait when he was 2, the New York/New Jersey bomber (Ahmad Khan Rahami) who came here from Afghanistan when he was 12, and the Ohio State Somali vehicular jihadist who came here as a teenager. As the report itself recognized, most of the 88 cases they studied involved a suspect who was less than 16 years old when admitted to the country.

Therefore, this DHS report, much like a broken clock that is right twice a day, accidentally stumbled across the truth: We have an assimilation problem with many immigrants from the Middle East. The last thing you want to do, then, is to bring in more from the Middle East – to the tune of 160,000 a year – when we badly need to assimilate the record numbers that already migrated here over the past 15 years.

The real number to focus on is not the few people who will have a known paper trail linking them to terrorists from day one, but the 90-plus percent from countries like Iraq who subscribe to Shariah. That is why it was such a mistake for Trump to remove Iraq from the list; Trump should have cited this report as reason to expand the moratorium to places like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.

Undoubtedly, there is also an element of vetting that is important — for example, in the case of Tashfeen Malik (one of the San Bernardino shooters). She should have never been admitted from Pakistan; her social media accounts and her basic biography reeked of Islamic supremacy. Then again, the people drafting these DHS reports don’t believe in vetting the supremacist mentality that cultivates the climate of terror.

Nobody disputes that if you only vet for known ISIS ties up front, many people will slip through the net. Yet, at the same time, it completely misses the point. Just ask our friends in Europe. “

https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/03/leaked-dhs-report-proves-trumps-point-on-immigration

Remember this one key point G-d is always in control and in charge. It is not humans who put people  in their place of power IT IS THE ONE TRUE LIVING G-D.

The Sixties Radical-Azriel

This story jumped out at me.

Read and see what the real truth is about what is going on with this country not fake made up daily soap opera news by the state run and control media.

This is taken from the Conservative Review written by Chris Pandolfo.

This story appears on the Mark Levin website. http://www.marklevinshow.com/

“Conservative Review Editor-in-Chief Mark Levin gave an interview on Fox News’ Fox and Friends Weekend Sunday morning in which he laid out the case against the Obama administration use of “police state tactics” against President Donald Trump. “The evidence is overwhelming,” Levin said. Using public records and mainstream media reporting, he showed how the Obama administration obtained a FISA court warrant to surveil Donald Trump’s presidential campaign last year. The question is, to what extent did the Obama administration spy on Donald Trump’s campaign?

Levin took pains to reiterate that the evidence of spying by the Obama administration is not his own speculation. The mainstream media has presented the case in the course of a year of reports on the Obama administration. Levin just connected the dots.

Going forward, the Trump administration ought to pursue the release of the Obama administration’s FISA court warrants and the documents regarding the application for those warrants. A Congressional investigation into the extent of the spying on Trump’s campaign is necessary, and Congress should request copies of President Obama’s daily intelligence briefings for the duration of the surveillance on Donald Trump’s campaign.

As for President Trump? He should appoint a Deputy Attorney General to investigate from the executive branch.”

https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2017/03/mark-levin-on-fox-news-lays-out-the-case-on-obamas-spying

One quick note. Always remember the G-d of my father’s Avraham, Yitz’chak, and Ya’akov is in control. When G-d opens a  door no human power can shut it.

The Sixties Radical-Azriel

ydsx9781676

The crowds were cheering.

The America as we knew it was about to be led to the hangman’s gallows.

It sure looked like Evil would win.

The haters of America looked victorious.

The hangman prepared his noose around America’s neck.

The crowd went nuts.

They cheered on the hangman.

G-d’s people cried out.

We begged for mercy.

We begged for forgiveness.

We prayed.

We cried.

Both Jew and gentile alike called on HaShem to spare us from our so-called fate.

Then on election night November 8th I saw the hand of G-d come down.

Trump won.

G-d heard our prayers.

We were given a stay of execution.

G-d gave us time to get our house in order.

G-d’s house.

G-d’s hand of grace and love is all over this election.

This doesn’t mean we can revert back to our old ways.

This means we must get G-d’s house in order.

We are on borrowed time to get it right.

The line is drawn in the sand.

Fight or die.

I choose fight and live for G-d’s house.

G-d used Trump to shine the light on the evil that is in this country and the world.

The liars in the media, the elected officials of Democrat and some of the elected officials of the Republican and many parts of American Culture and institutions are now exposed to the light of day for who they are.

Agents of Satan

We know what is behind all of this.

The principalities of darkness.

Evil!

The lairs cannot hide behind the cover of darkness.

The truth is exposed as truth. And the lairs are exposed for who they truly are.

Destruction of G-d’s house, Israel and the USA as we know it.

G-d is contracting himself so we can have freedom of choice.

One has to look very deep and hard to see G-d in all of this. Yet HaShem is in control of everything.

The word world comes from the Hebrew word concealment.

G-d’s word and HIS will be done with or without us

The Sixties Radical-Azriel

wjcm9781678

Tell me you found G‑d in a tidy package—I will tell you that it is not G‑d, that it is a product of a clever mind.

Tell me you found G‑d in the limitless beyond—beyond space, beyond time. That too is not G‑d. That is just a greater mind.

Where the boundless dwells within a bounded space, where darkness shines, silence sings, bitterness is sweet and a moment lives forever, where a man and a woman live in harmony, an adult learns from a child, a warrior spreads kindness, and enmity subsides to make room for friendship and love, where the body embraces the soul and the soul the body, in the union of all opposites—

—there is G‑d; there is the essence of all that is real. (an underlying theme in the Rebbe’s thought

http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/114354/jewish/Reality-in-Untidy-Boxes.htm